PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 13, 2026International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology0 citations

Cranial Nerve Injury in Endoscopic Endonasal Approach to Skull Base Surgery: A Systematic Review

View Full Paper
AHAlexandra HunterTZTanner J. ZachemAGAnthony Ghanem

Key Points

  • This review aims to evaluate the incidence and management of cranial nerve injuries in endoscopic endonasal surgery.
  • Systematic review following PRISMA-SR guidelines.
  • Searched multiple databases including Medline and Embase.
  • Screened 2796 studies, including 177 relevant reports.
  • Analyzed cases involving 18,546 patients.
  • 859 cranial nerve injuries were reported, with abducens, optic, and olfactory nerves most affected.
  • Full recovery occurred in 38.4% of injury cases, while 29.9% experienced permanent deficits.
  • Intraoperative neuromonitoring showed prognostic potential, but injury prevention evidence is lacking.
  • Only 5% of studies focused on postoperative management, revealing a significant care gap.

Abstract

The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) to the skull base has revolutionized the management of ventral skull base lesions, offering superior visualization and reduced morbidity. Yet, iatrogenic cranial nerve (CN) injuries, causing temporary or permanent deficits, remain an underexplored complication that significantly affects quality of life. This systematic review describes the number of reported cases of CN injuries in EEA and the evidence on prevention and management strategies. Following PRISMA-SR guidelines, we searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, and screened 2796 studies; 177 were included. Across 18,546 patients, 859 CN injuries were reported. The abducens (24.4%), optic (23.7%), and olfactory (18.6%) nerves were most affected, linked primarily to pituitary adenomas (34.49%) and sellar approaches (34.4%). Full recovery occurred in 38.4% of cases, while 29.9% had permanent deficits. Intraoperative neuromonitoring was reported in 34 studies, showing prognostic value but lacking definitive evidence for injury prevention. Only 5% of studies addressed postoperative management, highlighting a care gap. This review emphasizes the need for standardized reporting, enhanced monitoring, and robust postoperative strategies to optimize EEA outcomes. Future directions include prospective studies and patient-reported outcomes to refine skull base surgery safety.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hunter et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b3ac8102a1e69014cce4c4https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.70134
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Endoscopic endonasal approach to cholesterol granulomas of the petrous apex: a series of 17 patients2012 · 58 citations
  2. 2The extended direct endonasal transsphenoidal approach for nonadenomatous suprasellar tumors2005 · 280 citations
  3. 3Expanded endoscopic endonasal surgery for advanced stage juvenile angiofibromas: a retrospective multi-center study2016 · 23 citations
  4. 4Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Approach From the Surgeon Point of View2017 · 19 citations
  5. 5Three-Hand Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Surgery: Experience With an Anatomy-Preserving Mononostril Approach Technique2017 · 15 citations