PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 13, 2026Odontology0 citationsOpen Access

Effects of desensitizing treatments on acid-etched dentin: debris precipitation, bond strength and tag formation

VSVitória Lacerda SantosAMAlejandro Nicolás Tejada MedinaABAntônia Patricia Oliveira Barros

Key Points

  • The research aims to assess how various desensitizing treatments affect dentin properties such as bond strength and debris precipitation after acid exposure.
  • Bovine incisors were divided into four treatment groups: three desensitizing formulations and a control.
  • Teeth were subjected to an acid challenge using orange juice, followed by rinsing with distilled water.
  • Scanning electron microscopy was used to analyze debris and tubular occlusion, while bond strength was tested using micro-shear methods.
  • Optical microscopy assessed tag formation across the treatment groups.
  • The Regenerate group exhibited significantly higher debris precipitation compared to other treatments.
  • There were fewer open dentinal tubules observed in the Regenerate group.
  • Higher bond strength and a greater incidence of cohesive failures were noted with Regenerate treatment.
  • Tag formation was consistent across all treatment groups, showing no significant differences.

Abstract

Abstract To evaluate the effects of formulations containing potassium nitrate, silicate, and calcium phosphate, subjected to an acid challenge, on debris precipitation, quantification of exposed dentinal tubules, bond strength, failure mode, and tag formation. One hundred and twenty bovine incisors were randomly allocated into four groups: Desensibilize NanoP, Desensibilize KF 2%, Regenerate NR-5, and a control group. Specimens were immersed daily for 5 min in orange juice (pH 3.80 ± 0.04) and then rinsed with distilled water. Forty teeth were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy to assess debris precipitation and tubular occlusion. Another forty were subjected to micro-shear bond strength testing, and the remaining forty were analyzed under optical microscopy for tag formation. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis/Dunn test (debris precipitation) and ANOVA/Tukey test (open tubules, bond strength, and tag formation), with a significance level of α = 0.05. The Regenerate group showed significantly higher debris precipitation, fewer open dentinal tubules, greater bond strength, and a higher incidence of cohesive failures. Tag formation was similar across all groups. The Regenerate protocol demonstrated superior performance in debris precipitation, tubule occlusion, bond strength, and tag formation, particularly when used in combination with a universal adhesive.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Santos et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b3ac9002a1e69014cce512https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-026-01334-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper