PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 13, 2026Complex & Intelligent Systems0 citationsOpen Access

A multi agent collaborative framework for style guided knowledge reorganization of scientific source texts

YZYao ZhengLGLei GuoZCZhongyang Cai

Key Points

  • The research aims to develop a framework that improves the reorganization of complex scientific texts into accessible popular science writing.
  • Proposed a multi-agent collaborative framework named STMAC.
  • Utilized LLM-based domain expert agents for grounding and verification.
  • Employed rewriting agents focused on reader-friendly expression.
  • Conducted experiments across multiple datasets.
  • STMAC achieved consistent preference gains in evaluations by both LLM-based evaluators and human assessors.
  • Improvements were noted in clarity and readability of rewrites.
  • Maintained alignment with original source materials, enhancing scientific rigor.

Abstract

Popular science writing requires reorganizing dense scientific materials into accessible explanations, yet manual production is costly and difficult to scale. While large language models enable efficient rewriting, existing systems often lack explicit planning for information reorganization and are prone to single-agent bias, leading to fragmented explanations or weakened scientific rigor. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a multi-agent collaborative framework for style-guided, source-grounded knowledge reconstruction in popular science communication, termed STMAC. The framework restructures and refines scientific source materials through a role-divided workflow, where LLM-based domain expert agents provide domain grounding and verification, and rewriting agents realize reader-friendly expression under style and structure constraints. This collaboration improves clarity and readability while maintaining alignment with the original source materials. Experiments across multiple datasets with diverse content types show that STMAC achieves consistent preference gains under both LLM based evaluators and human assessment over representative recent style transfer baselines, indicating higher quality rewrites and improved scientific rigor. These results suggest a practical and controllable solution for applying LLMs to source grounded knowledge reorganization for popular science communication.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zheng et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b3aca302a1e69014cce7a9https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-026-02259-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1AI-Assisted Tools for Scientific Review Writing: Opportunities and Cautions.2025 · 18 citations
  2. 2Agentic publications: redesigning scientific publishing in the age of thinking large language models2026
  3. 3Re4: Scientific Computing Agent with Rewriting, Resolution, Review and Revision2025
  4. 4Multicrossmodal Automated Agent for Integrating Diverse Materials Science Data2025
  5. 5Autonomous Chemistry and Materials Innovation Driven by Scientific Agents2026