PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026BMC Palliative Care0 citationsOpen Access

TikTok and Bilibili as sources of palliative care information: an analysis of quality and reliability

View Full Paper
RZRuoyue ZhouYLYang LiCYChao Yan

Key Points

  • The study assesses the quality and reliability of palliative care videos on TikTok and Bilibili.
  • Identified 100 top Chinese-language palliative care videos from TikTok and Bilibili
  • Categorized videos based on source and content
  • Evaluated video quality using Global Quality Score, JAMA, and modified mDISCERN scoring tools.
  • Quality metrics showed that videos from healthcare practitioners had significantly higher scores than non-professionals
  • Overall video content displayed lower quality and reliability on both platforms
  • Palliative care videos communicated essential concepts effectively, but overall quality was found to be lacking.

Abstract

The development and popularization of palliative care have garnered significant attention. Short-video platforms TikTok and Bilibili boast vast audiences, enabling users to readily access related information. However, the quality of palliative care content available on these platforms remains uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the quality and reliability of Chinese-language palliative care-related short videos on the TikTok and Bilibili video-sharing platforms. We selected the top 100 Chinese-language palliative care videos from Bilibili and TikTok based on comprehensive rankings, categorizing them by source and content. Three scoring tools—Global Quality Score (GQS), JAMA, and modified mDISCERN—were used to evaluate video quality and reliability. The 200 videos included in this study primarily originated from five sources: individual creators (n = 79, 39.5%), healthcare practitioners (n = 64, 32%), news media (n = 28, 14%), for-profit organizations (n = 15, 7.5%), and non-profit organizations (n = 14, 7%). Based on content, videos were categorized into six themes: relevant concepts (n = 98, 49%), practice examples (n = 85, 42.5%), life education (n = 74, 37%), specific service details (n = 71, 35.5%), industry status (n = 45, 22.5%), and future outlook (n = 25, 12.5%). Regarding video quality and reliability, palliative care-related content on TikTok and Bilibili demonstrated lower quality. TikTok’s median GQS, JAMA, and mDISCERN scores were 2.00, 1.00, and 2.00, respectively, while Bilibili’s median scores for these metrics were 3.00, 2.00, and 2.00. Videos posted by healthcare professionals scored significantly higher on GQS (p < 0.05), mDISCERN (p < 0.01), and JAMA (p < 0.05) compared to non-professionals. Likes, shares, and comments showed a weak positive correlation with video quality, while likes and comments exhibited a weak negative correlation with video duration. This study found that the number of Chinese-language palliative care videos on TikTok and Bilibili is limited, with generally low quality and reliability. Videos posted by healthcare professionals demonstrated higher quality and reliability. Content-wise, these videos effectively conveyed basic palliative care concepts to the public, aiding in the dissemination of life education. Future efforts should encourage healthcare professionals to produce more high-quality video content to promote public awareness of palliative care.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhou et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4b9db18185d8a39802081https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-026-02051-x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1TikTok and Bilibili as health information sources on gastroesophageal reflux disease: an assessment of content and its quality2024 · 11 citations
  2. 2Health information in short videos about metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease: Analysing quality and reliability2024 · 25 citations
  3. 3Social Media Use for Health Purposes: Systematic Review2021 · 1,086 citations
  4. 4Research on Health Topics Communicated through TikTok: A Systematic Review of the Literature2024 · 21 citations
  5. 5Status of palliative care education in Mainland China: A systematic review2020 · 43 citations