PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026Veterinary Pathology0 citationsOpen Access

Effects of fixation and demineralization on immunohistochemical assessment of canine bone marrow

View Full Paper
GDGabriella M. L. DiamantinoJBJanet Beeler-MarfisiRFRA Foster

Key Points

  • This research aimed to assess how different fixatives and demineralizers affect immunohistochemical analysis of bone marrow samples.
  • Collected sternal BM samples from dogs after death
  • Fixed samples using acetic acid-zinc-formalin or neutral-buffered formalin for 24 hours
  • Demineralized with formic acid, hydrochloric acid, or EDTA for varying durations
  • Scored immunohistochemical sections for specific antigens by independent raters
  • Immunopositive BM cell percentages varied from 1.3% to 22.5% across different antigens
  • NBF showed lower background scores for CD3 compared to AZF
  • Signal intensity remained similar for both AZF and NBF
  • EDTA resulted in higher percentages of immunopositive cells compared to acid demineralization

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different fixatives and demineralizers on immunohistochemical (IHC) detection of antigens in bone marrow (BM). Sternal BM samples were collected within 24 hours of death from dogs with spontaneous disease, fixed with acetic acid-zinc-formalin (AZF) or 10% neutral-buffered formalin (NBF) for 24 hours, and decalcified with formic acid, hydrochloric acid, or ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) for 1, 12, or 24 hours, respectively. Immunohistochemical sections for CD3, CD20, CD34, CD204, FLT3, and factor VIII-related antigen (FVIII-rAG) were scored for background, signal intensity, and percent positive cells by 4 independent raters. Some endothelial but not hematopoietic cells were CD34 immunopositive, precluding further assessment. Immunopositive BM cells ranged from 1.3% to 18.3% (CD3), 1.3% to 22.3% (CD20), 0.5% to 22.5% (CD204), and 0% to 17.6% (FLT3). Background scores were similar for all antigens and fixatives except for CD3, for which NBF yielded lower scores than AZF. The signal intensity for all IHC assays was similar for AZF and NBF. The percentage of FLT3- and FVIII-rAG-immunopositive cells was slightly higher in AZF- than NBF-fixed samples. Different demineralizers yielded similar results for all IHC assays except higher background for CD20/EDTA. Signal intensity was higher for CD204 in samples demineralized with EDTA rather than acids. Higher percentages of CD204 and FLT3 immunopositive cells were noted with EDTA relative to acid demineralization. Overall, with the use of stringently standardized pre-analytic and processing protocols, all IHC assays yielded acceptable results, and differences between protocols were considered minor.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Diamantino et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4b9fb18185d8a398025b8https://doi.org/10.1177/03009858261426547
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper