PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026Journal of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System0 citations

Comparative efficacy of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor antagonists in preclinical renal ischemia-reperfusion injury models: Multilevel and network meta-analyses

View Full Paper
SASelda Emre AydıngözATAriyan TeimooriMKMurat Koçak

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare the effectiveness of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor antagonists in renal ischemia-reperfusion injury models.
  • Conducted a multilevel and network meta-analysis of 55 studies
  • Analyzed serum creatinine data from 96 comparisons involving 1233 animals
  • Assessed publication bias through Egger's test and 1/√n methods
  • ACEIs/ARBs lowered creatinine significantly (mean difference: -1.74; p < 0.0001)
  • Meta-regression identified drug identity, dose, and route as key effect modifiers
  • Azilsartan and telmisartan ranked highest in network analysis despite limited evidence

Abstract

Hypothesis/Introduction The renin-angiotensin system plays a central role in renal ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). We evaluated the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and AT1 receptor blockers (ARBs) in preclinical renal IRI models using multilevel and network meta-analyses (PROSPERO: CRD42024599859). Materials and Methods Database searches identified 55 studies. Serum creatinine data were pooled using three-level random-effects models (96 comparisons, n = 1233 animals). Publication bias was assessed using Egger and 1/√n methods. Drugs were ranked via P-scores. Results ACEIs/ARBs significantly reduced creatinine (standardized mean difference: −1.74; 95% CI: −2.22 to −1.26; p < 0.0001) with high heterogeneity. Egger's test showed asymmetry ( p < 0.0001), but 1/√n-based testing did not ( p = 0.160), suggesting mathematical artifact rather than publication bias. Multivariable meta-regression identified drug identity, dose, and route as key effect modifiers. Network analysis ranked azilsartan and telmisartan highest, though evidence remains limited (no direct comparisons, n = 2 for azilsartan). Secondary outcomes confirmed renal protection. Conclusions ACEIs/ARBs effectively reduce renal IRI in animals, with azilsartan and telmisartan ranking favorably despite limited evidence. High-dose intravenous administration enhances efficacy. Most studies used pre-ischemia protocols relevant only to transplantation. Post-injury models with comorbid animals of both sexes and direct drug comparisons are needed for clinical translation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Aydıngöz et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4ba0818185d8a398026e6https://doi.org/10.1177/14703203261430477
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper