PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026Heart Lung and Circulation0 citationsOpen Access

Cancer Survivors’ and Health Care Professionals’ Views on Managing Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Cancer: A Qualitative Study to Inform a Model of Care

EKEmma KempSLSharon LawnMMMichelle Miller

Key Result

Cancer survivors and health care professionals identified a significant need for coordinated, multidisciplinary care models to address cardiovascular disease risk.

Key Points

  • The study aims to understand preferences for managing cardiovascular disease risk in cancer survivors.
  • Conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews and focus groups
  • Engaged cancer survivors, healthcare professionals, and representatives from non-government organizations
  • Analyzed data using reflexive thematic analysis
  • Identified four main themes: awareness of CVD risk, models of care, priority of CVD risk, and need for self-management support
  • Highlighted barriers to CVD management in cancer, such as survivor awareness and information overwhelm
  • Emphasized the need for coordinated, multidisciplinary care and potential nurse-led clinical pathways

Structured PICO

P
Population
58 stakeholders in Australia, including 24 cancer survivors and caregivers (median age 69, 50% male, various cancers including 54.2% prostate and 33.3% breast) and 34 health care professionals (HCPs) and non-government organisation (NGO) representatives.
O
Outcome
Views on managing cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in cancer survivors, exploring challenges, needs, and preferences for implementing a model of care

Managing CVD risk in cancer survivors is an unmet need requiring multilevel strategies for capacity-building, multidisciplinary coordination, and self-management support.

Abstract

AimPrevention and management of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in cancer survivors is crucial to reduce the burden of comorbid CVD; however, little is known about preferred models of care to address CVD risks.This study examined Australian cancer survivors' and health care professionals' (HCPs) views on managing CVD risk in cancer survivors, exploring challenges, needs, and preferences for implementing a model of care. MethodQualitative semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted with survivors, HCPs, and non-government organisation representatives, and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. ResultsFour themes were developed: awareness and communication of CVD risk; models of care; relative priority of CVD risk; and need for self-management support.Despite identifying the need for a model of care including self-management support, participants identified several barriers to CVD management in cancer, including limited survivor awareness of CVD risk in cancer; information overwhelm; focus on cancer treatment and immediate side effects; limitations experienced by HCPs (e.g., time, expertise); and limitations in accessing specialist/allied health services.Improvement in care was deemed to require coordination, multidisciplinary involvement, and capacity building, including leveraging existing services.Potential for a nurse-led clinical pathway was emphasised. ConclusionsManaging CVD risk in cancer survivors represents an important unmet need; meeting this need requires multilevel strategies for capacity-building and self-management support.Future research exploring the utility of models of care is warranted.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kemp et al. (2026) studied this question. Cancer survivors and health care professionals identified a significant need for coordinated, multidisciplinary care models to address cardiovascular disease risk.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4fa9ab39f7826a300b44ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2025.10.012
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cardiovascular disease competes with breast cancer as the leading cause of death for older females diagnosed with breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study2011 · 906 citations
  2. 2Inequity in Cardio‐Oncology: Identifying Disparities in Cardiotoxicity and Links to Cardiac and Cancer Outcomes2021 · 92 citations
  3. 3Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis2019 · 19,004 citations
  4. 42022 ESC Guidelines on cardio-oncology developed in collaboration with the European Hematology Association (EHA), the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ESTRO) and the International Cardio-Oncology Society (IC-OS)2022 · 511 citations
  5. 5Impact of Baseline Cardiovascular Comorbidity on Outcomes in Women With Breast Cancer: A Real-world, Population-based Study2018 · 18 citations