PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026Journal of Environmental Management0 citationsOpen Access

Different stakeholder-based forest management scenarios facilitate balancing conservation and production in the bioeconomy

View Full Paper
LHLaura HenckelJKJulian KleinJEJeannette Eggers

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the impact of stakeholder-based forest management scenarios on conservation species in a Swedish landscape over 100 years.
  • Investigated eleven indicator species under four forestry scenarios for key stakeholders.
  • Used colonization-extinction models and species distribution models for analysis.
  • Examined effects of management approaches including continuous cover forestry and clearcutting.
  • Most species showed stable or increasing populations except under private landowners' production-oriented scenarios.
  • Continuous cover forestry promoted positive developments for six wood-decaying fungi, whereas clearcutting led to significant losses.
  • Strict protection of 14.5% by the state-owned forest company increased species occupancy.
  • Additional protection and diverse management regimes can further enhance metapopulation sizes.

Abstract

Land-use policies founded on the expertise and interests of key stakeholders are likely the most implementable and politically long-lasting, assuming stakeholders share a broader, similar perception of the future. We investigated whether there is a difference in how eleven indicator species of conservation concern may be affected given policy and forestry scenarios of four key forest stakeholders for a 100 000 ha Swedish landscape over the coming 100 years. We used colonization-extinction models and species distribution models. Most species had stable or increasing metapopulation sizes or occurrence probabilities after 100 years under all except the most production-oriented scenario by private landowners. For six wood-decaying fungi, forests protected or managed with continuous cover forestry (CCF) drove the positive developments. By contrast, these species essentially disappeared from stands with even-aged clearcutting forestry. Regarding the 14.5% strict protection applied by the state-owned forest company increased the area occupied by these species. Protecting an even larger area and application of CCF in the scenarios of the (non-)governmental conservation organizations increased fungal metapopulation sizes even more. Four bird species showed stable or positive developments in all scenarios. The same held true for the epiphytic lichen Lobaria pulmonaria , because the management applied projected increasing host tree numbers and densities. Thus, protecting up to 20% of the productive forest, applying more alternative management regimes and less even-aged clearcutting rotation forestry has the potential to greatly increase the (meta)population size and improve the red-list status of all the focal species, and presumably also of other species of conservation concern. • Policies based on stakeholder interests are the most implementable, long-lasting. • Several stakeholder scenarios mean future increases of conservation species. • Share of continuous cover forestry and protection drive positive developments. • Some species largely disappear from stands with even-aged clearcutting management. • Strictly protecting up to 20% can compensate for clearcutting management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Henckel et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4fa9ab39f7826a300b5ddhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.129234
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper