PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026BMC Ophthalmology0 citationsOpen Access

Parafoveal retinal function of epiretinal membrane foveoschisis: a pilot comparison among ERM phenotypes using MP-3 microperimetry

RSReio SekineTJTatsuya JujoKKKota Kakehashi

Key Points

  • The study aims to compare the functional and structural outcomes of three types of epiretinal membranes (ERMs) and examine characteristics of the foveoschisis subtype.
  • Retrospective pilot study of 32 eyes categorized into ERM, ERM with ectopic inner foveal layers (EIFL), and ERM foveoschisis (ERM-F).
  • Used swept-source OCT to assess central macular thickness and retinal morphology.
  • Evaluated best-corrected visual acuity and retinal sensitivity at baseline and multiple postoperative time points using MP-3 microperimetry.
  • EIFL had significantly worse baseline best-corrected visual acuity and central macular thickness compared to ERM and ERM-F (p < 0.05).
  • Cystoid spaces were more prevalent in both EIFL and ERM-F than in ERM (p < 0.001).
  • By 6 months, ERM-F showed similar parafoveal sensitivity to typical ERM, while EIFL retained lower sensitivity across all time points.

Abstract

To compare structural and functional outcomes among three epiretinal membrane (ERM) phenotypes—ERM without ectopic inner foveal layers (EIFL), ERM with EIFL, and ERM foveoschisis (ERM-F)—and to explore the anatomical and functional characteristics of ERM-F in a single-center, retrospective pilot study. Thirty-two eyes of 32 patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy were categorized as ERM (n = 16), EIFL (n = 11), or ERM-F (n = 5). Swept-source OCT quantified central macular thickness (CMT) and morphology (cystoid spaces, retinal surface wrinkling, ellipsoid zone disruption, posterior vitreous detachment). Functional assessments included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR), parafoveal retinal sensitivity measured by MP-3 microperimetry within the central 5°, and M-CHARTS (horizontal/vertical). Assessments were performed at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Baseline demographic characteristics, fixation stability, and metamorphopsia scores were similar across groups. Baseline BCVA and CMT were worse in EIFL than in ERM or ERM-F (both p < 0.05). Cystoid spaces were more frequent in EIFL and ERM-F than in ERM (p < 0.001). CMT decreased in ERM and EIFL (both p < 0.01) but not in ERM-F. BCVA improved postoperatively in the ERM and EIFL groups, and no significant intergroup differences in BCVA were observed at any postoperative time point. In contrast, MP-3 microperimetry demonstrated persistently lower retinal sensitivity in the EIFL group compared with the ERM group at all postoperative time points (all p < 0.05), while ERM-F showed parafoveal sensitivity numerically close to ERM by 6 months. Metamorphopsia (M-CHARTS) did not differ among groups; only ERM showed significant postoperative improvement in horizontal scores. Despite characteristic parafoveal schisis, ERM-F demonstrated postoperative BCVA and parafoveal sensitivity comparable to typical ERM, while EIFL remained functionally worse. MP-3 can reveal focal deficits not captured by BCVA, underscoring the value of multimodal assessment. As an exploratory, hypothesis-generating pilot study, these findings suggest that ERM-F may represent a relatively milder tractional phenotype and warrant confirmation in larger, prospective studies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sekine et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4fb8db39f7826a300bc28https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-026-04726-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper