PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Baryon Asymmetry (Why Do We Exist?) Through the Lens of GCST Global Complexity–Stability Theory as a Thermodynamic Generalization of the Sakharov Conditions

View Full Paper
RLRoman Lukin

Key Points

  • The research aims to understand baryon asymmetry as a result of Global Complexity–Stability Theory rather than traditional models.
  • Utilized GCST to analyze baryon production and the conditions for asymmetry.
  • Explored the role of the electroweak phase transition and stability index dynamics.
  • Identified the thermodynamic implications of complexity growth rates.
  • Discovered that baryon asymmetry is a natural outcome of complexity growth overcoming recovery capacity.
  • Introduced the concept of an 'instability window' that contributed to structural debt in the form of excess baryons.
  • Generalized Sakharov conditions to include thermodynamic triggers for baryon production.

Abstract

Abstract Standard cosmology predicts equal production of matter and antimatter in the early Universe, which should have annihilated completely, leaving only radiation. Yet we observe a tiny baryon asymmetry η = nb / n_γ ≈ 6 × 10⁻¹⁰ — one extra baryon per billion particle–antiparticle pairs — allowing atoms, stars, and life to exist. Global Complexity–Stability Theory (GCST) interprets this asymmetry not as an ad-hoc CP-violating parameter, but as the inevitable outcome of a Rate-Induced Transition when the complexity growth rate α overwhelmed the symmetric recovery capacity γ. The stability index dropped below 1 during a brief “instability window” (electroweak phase transition era, t ≈ 10⁻¹² s), forcing irreversible accumulation of structural debt D in the form of excess baryons. GCST generalizes the Sakharov conditions: baryon number violation, CP violation, and departure from equilibrium are necessary but not sufficient — the thermodynamic trigger is the transient G < 1 regime that selects the direction of debt accumulation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Roman Lukin (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4fb8db39f7826a300bc98https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18977006
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper