PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth0 citations

Classification of Seismic Events in the Mainland of China Based on Spectrograms and Model Interpretability

View Full Paper
YCYongjie ChenZXZhuo XiaoYFYuanyuan V. Fu

Key Points

  • The aim is to accurately classify seismic events using a deep learning model while enhancing interpretability.
  • Collected 99,600 three-component waveform records from 2,870 seismic events.
  • Developed the ResWaveQuake model based on multi-branch ResNet architecture.
  • Used logarithmic time-frequency spectrograms and convolutional wavelet transforms for input data.
  • Employed a progressive interpretability framework including Grad-CAM++ and Integrated Gradients.
  • Achieved 96.52% classification accuracy on the test set.
  • Identified distinct frequency patterns for earthquakes vs. explosions and collapses.
  • Demonstrated consistent event-specific patterns across various epicentral distances and source depths.

Abstract

Abstract Accurate identification of seismic event types is crucial for seismic monitoring, early warning, and disaster prevention. Traditional classification methods relying on manual features, while deep learning approaches improve automation, still face challenges in practical application due to limited interpretability. This study collected 99,600 three‐component waveform records from 2,870 events including natural earthquakes, explosions, and collapses from China Digital Seismograph Network (2013–2024). We propose ResWaveQuake, a multi‐branch ResNet‐based model for single‐component classification using logarithmic time‐frequency spectrograms, incorporating convolutional wavelet transform, coordinate attention, and agent attention mechanisms. ResWaveQuake achieves 96.52% classification accuracy on the test set, employing a network‐based voting mechanism. To enhance decision transparency, a progressive interpretability framework is employed, combining Grad‐CAM++, Integrated Gradients, and occlusion testing to examine feature attribution patterns across different event types, source depths, and epicentral distances. The analysis reveals that earthquakes focus on high‐frequency body waves, while explosions and collapses emphasize S‐wave coda, with stable event‐specific patterns across distances and depths. These findings indicate that the model captures seismic propagation characteristics that are generally consistent with physical observations, offering insights into the signal features underlying automated seismic event classification.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4fb9db39f7826a300bf0bhttps://doi.org/10.1029/2025jb032752
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Exploration of Machine Learning Methods to Seismic Event Discrimination in the Pacific Northwest2026
  2. 2Bayesian Network Inference for Low-Magnitude Nonnatural Seismic Event Discrimination2024
  3. 3Classifying Small Earthquakes, Explosions, and Collapses in the Western United States Using Physics-Based Features and Machine Learning2024 · 12 citations
  4. 4Integrated spatial–spectral classification of natural and shale-gas-induced earthquakes in Chongqing, Southwest China2026
  5. 5Dual-Branch Adaptive Joint Decision-Making: Intelligent Identification of Seismic Events Supported by Single-Component Waveform Data from Multiple Global Regions2026