PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Ionic release and electrochemical testing of 3-D printed orthodontics metallic bands made of Co-Cr and stainless-steel alloys

View Full Paper
SZSPIROS ZINELISASAikaterini SakellariSKSotirios Karavoltsos

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the ionic release and electrochemical characteristics of Co-Cr and stainless-steel orthodontic bands.
  • 3D printed 36 metallic orthodontic bands using SS and Co-Cr alloys.
  • Measured ionic release per ISO 27020:2019 using flame atomic absorption spectrometry.
  • Characterized electrochemical properties using Open Circuit Potential, Anodic Scan, and Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy.
  • Used 0.1M NaCl and 0.1M lactic acid solutions for testing.
  • Performed statistical comparison using t-tests and Mann-Whitney tests.
  • SS bands had an approximately 44-fold higher total ionic release compared to Co-Cr bands.
  • Both alloys showed no significant differences in corrosion potential, but Co-Cr had higher beneficial OCP, corrosion current density, and pitting corrosion potential values.
  • Electrochemical tests indicated lower charge transfer resistance for Co-Cr alloy, suggesting decreased corrosion rate.

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the electrochemical characteristics and ionic release of three-dimensional (3D) printed orthodontic metallic bands made of stainless-steel (SS) and Cobalt-Chromium (Co-Cr) alloys. Materials and Methods Thirty-six orthodontic metallic bands were prepared by 3D printing, employing SS (n = 18) and Co-Cr (n = 18) alloys. The ionic release from each alloy was determined according to ISO 27020:2019 requirements employing flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS). The electrochemical properties were characterized by Open Circuit Potential (OCP), Anodic Scan (AS) and Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS). In all cases a 0.1M NaCl, 0.1 M lactic acid solution was used. The EIS data were fitted to a Randles circuit and the sum of ionic release of probed elements after immersion along with OCP, zero corrosion potential (Ecorr), corrosion current density (Icorr), and pitting corrosion potential (Epit) were compared with t-tests/Mann-Whitney tests (α = 0.05). Results SS bands showed an approximately 44-fold higher total ionic release compared to Co-Cr ones. Electrochemical testing revealed no statistically significant differences for Ecorr but Co-Cr illustrated more beneficial OCP, Icorr and Epit values than SS. Both alloys illustrated semicircles in Nyquist plots, implying that the electrochemical process was under charge transfer control, while the equivalent circuit simulation showed a higher charge transfer resistance for Co-Cr alloy (SS:14191.1 vs Co-Cr:33158.7 Ωcm2), implying lower corrosion current and thus decreased corrosion rate. Conclusion Immersion and electrochemical testing indicated that Co-Cr alloys showed increased corrosion resistance over SS ones, which might affect efficacy under clinical use.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

ZINELIS et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4fb9db39f7826a300bf84https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-292875
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper