PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026Advances in Health Sciences Education1 citationsOpen Access

Beyond the curriculum: negotiating power and knowledge in informal trans health educational initiatives

IBInna Blus-KadoshGHGilly Hartal

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the role of informal educational initiatives in addressing trans health knowledge deficiencies within medical education.
  • Conducted semi-structured interviews with 39 healthcare professionals, transgender individuals, and activists.
  • Analyzed relevant documents related to trans health education and observations at lectures.
  • Applied boundary object theory to evaluate knowledge exchange across institutional boundaries.
  • Informal initiatives foster direct dialogue and knowledge sharing between medical and trans communities.
  • Their impact is limited by entrenched power dynamics and lack of formal curricular integration.
  • Informal educational practices can unintentionally reinforce exclusion through institutional gatekeeping.

Abstract

The transgender community faces significant barriers in healthcare due to inadequate medical education and systemic discrimination, resulting in persistent health disparities and limited access to competent care. This study examines how informal educational initiatives, defined here as grassroots activities that operate outside formal medical curricula, serve as alternative strategies for addressing trans health knowledge gaps in medical education. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with 39 healthcare professionals, transgender individuals, and activists, as well as analysis of relevant documents and observations at lectures on transgender health, we apply boundary object theory to explore how these initiatives facilitate knowledge exchange across institutional boundaries. Our findings indicate that informal initiatives provide flexible platforms for engagement and learning, fostering direct dialogue and knowledge sharing between medical students, healthcare professionals and the transgender community. However, their broader impact is constrained by entrenched power dynamics and the lack of formal curricular integration, which limits their capacity for systemic change. This research offers novel insights by demonstrating that even well-intentioned educational practices can inadvertently reinforce exclusion through institutional gatekeeping. Our study demonstrates that while informal efforts can bridge some knowledge gaps, advancing health equity ultimately depends on institutional and policy reforms that embed community perspectives and expertise into medical education. Not applicable.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Blus-Kadosh et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4fbd5b39f7826a300c4bdhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-026-10529-9
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Bridging School and Practice? Barriers to the Integration of ‘Boundary Objects’ for Learning and Assessment in Clinical Nursing Education2024 · 6 citations
  2. 2The Cass Review: Cis-supremacy in the UK’s approach to healthcare for trans children2024 · 83 citations
  3. 3Exclusion and hospitality: the subtle dynamics of stigma in healthcare access for people emerging from alcohol and other drug treatment2020 · 58 citations
  4. 4Factors influencing LGBTQ+ disclosure decision-making by Canadian health professionals: A qualitative study2023 · 22 citations
  5. 5Situating and Constructing Diversity in Semi-Structured Interviews2015 · 841 citations