PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science0 citationsOpen Access

Ensuring Transparency and Trust in Supervised-Machine-Learning Studies: A Checklist for Psychological Researchers

View Full Paper
HMHanyi MinFGFeng GuoTSTianjun Sun

Key Points

  • To provide a checklist that enhances transparency and consistency in supervised machine learning research within psychology.
  • Developed a comprehensive checklist for supervised machine learning projects.
  • Outlined key information for each stage, including data collection and model evaluation.
  • Promoted open science principles to improve reporting standards.
  • Highlighted inconsistencies in current reporting practices among psychology researchers.
  • Proposed a structured guideline to aid in ethical ML research reporting.
  • Encouraged future adaptations of the checklist for broader use.

Abstract

Machine-learning (ML) algorithms are being rapidly incorporated into the work of psychologists given their capability and flexibility in analyzing large-scale, complex, or otherwise messy data sets. In this context and in the spirit of open science, ML research should be conducted in a transparent, understandable, and ethical manner. However, publications by psychology researchers and practitioners show a troubling lack of consistency in reporting ML information. Given that ML offers a wide range of analytical options, in this article, we address an important need by providing a comprehensive, open-science checklist that specifies the information researchers should disclose at each stage of a supervised-ML project—from data collection and preprocessing to model selection, evaluation, interpretation, and code sharing. We hope that psychological researchers will benefit from this checklist when reporting ML results and will adapt and extend this checklist further in the future.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Min et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4fbd5b39f7826a300c4fehttps://doi.org/10.1177/25152459261419816
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper