PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026Synthese0 citationsOpen Access

Structural discrimination through ignorance: epistemic injustice, (social) norms, and disability

HCHugo Cossette-LefebvreMZMiklós Zala

Key Points

  • This paper aims to explore the connection between epistemic injustice and structural discrimination affecting disabled individuals.
  • Analyzed three subtypes of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, and non-disabled ignorance.
  • Utilized the Human Variation Model (HVM) of disability to frame the discussion.
  • Investigated the socio-structural basis for the persistence of discrimination.
  • Identified how epistemic injustices perpetuate structural discrimination.
  • Clarified the distinctions between structural discrimination and other forms.
  • Highlighted the critical nature of social norms in sustaining these injustices.

Abstract

This paper investigates the relationship between discrimination, epistemic injustice, and social structures as it pertains to the marginalization of disabled people. Doing so, we argue for a new understanding of structural discrimination. While discrimination is often viewed as an agent-centered or rule-based phenomenon, we argue that a broader socio-structural lens is crucial for understanding how it emerges and persists over time. Drawing on the Human Variation Model (HVM) of disability, we analyze three subtypes of epistemic injustice—testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, and non-disabled ignorance—and demonstrate their critical role in perpetuating structural discrimination. Our analysis addresses three gaps in the literature: (1) it clarifies the relationship between epistemic injustice and (structural) discrimination; (2) it highlights how epistemic injustices contribute to discrimination against disabled people; and (3) it allows us to have a better grasp of what structural discrimination is and how it differs from its direct and indirect counterparts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cossette-Lefebvre et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4fc1fb39f7826a300cc98https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-026-05517-w
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Health outcomes in economic evaluation: the QALY and utilities2010 · 1,152 citations
  2. 2Explaining Behavior1988 · 1,474 citations
  3. 3The Dynamics of Epistemic Injustice2025 · 29 citations
  4. 4Ignorance and Racial Insensitivity2016 · 52 citations
  5. 5The Welfarist Account of Disability2009 · 126 citations