PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026Nature0 citationsOpen Access

Snapshots of the dynamic basis of NTSR1 G protein subtype promiscuity

AVAlina A. VoAMArnab ModakSLSumin Lu

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand how the neurotensin receptor 1 interacts with different G protein subtypes through dynamic states.
  • Used time-resolved cryo-electron microscopy to visualize G-protein activation.
  • Analyzed the differences in activation pathways of Gα<sub>i1</sub> and Gα<sub>11</sub> heterotrimers.
  • Conducted molecular dynamics simulations to support structural findings.
  • Performed kinetic bioluminescence resonance energy transfer experiments to study stable intermediate states.
  • Executed single-molecule fluorescence assays to measure NTSR1-G protein complex dissociation.
  • Identified structural differences in Gα<sub>i1</sub> and Gα<sub>11</sub> intermediate states.
  • Established a correlation between ICL2/ICL3 sequences and G protein signaling stability.
  • Observed that NTSR1 dissociates faster from Gα<sub>11</sub> compared to Gα<sub>i1</sub>.
  • Demonstrated that transient intermediate complexes are crucial for understanding G protein selectivity.

Abstract

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are capable of signalling through four families of G protein α subunits. Although hundreds of nucleotide-free GPCR-G protein complex structures have been solved, the mechanism of G protein subtype selectivity remains poorly understood, with recent studies suggesting a role for dynamic nucleotide-bound intermediate states1,2. Here we use time-resolved cryo-electron microscopy to visualize the GTP-induced activation of Gαi1βγ and Gα11βγ heterotrimers bound to the neurotensin receptor 1 (NTSR1), which has been demonstrated to be highly promiscuous in G protein coupling and to possess unusual conformations in the nucleotide-free complex. We resolve ensembles of states along the G protein activation pathway, with differences in the structures and their relative populations between Gαi1 and Gα11. Structural analysis reveals a key role for several motifs, including intracellular loop 2 (ICL2) and ICL3, in stabilizing the observed intermediate states. Our results are supported by molecular dynamics simulations and kinetic bioluminescence resonance energy transfer experiments, which reveal that the stability of these intermediate states and the signalling of various G proteins are correlated with ICL2 and ICL3 sequences. Single-molecule fluorescence assays of GTP-induced NTSR1-G protein complex dissociation reveal that NTSR1 is liberated significantly faster from Gα11, consistent with the relative lack of stable Gα11-GTP intermediate states compared with Gαi1. These findings highlight that transient intermediate-state complexes along the G protein activation pathway have an important role in G protein selection that cannot be explained by nucleotide-free states alone.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Vo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4fc7fb39f7826a300d57fhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10120-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper