PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026Neuro-Oncology Pediatrics0 citationsOpen Access

QOL-02. Executive Functions and Externalizing Symptoms in Pediatric Brain Tumor Survivors

View Full Paper
CSChristina SharkeyHWHannah WeismanMGMeredith J Goyette

Key Points

  • This study examines the relationship between executive functions, processing speed, and externalizing problems in pediatric brain tumor survivors.
  • Data were collected from clinically referred pediatric brain tumor survivors (N = 177).
  • Parent-reported measures included BRIEF and CBCL, along with Wechsler Scale assessments.
  • Hierarchical regressions analyzed demographic factors, executive functions, working memory, and processing speed effects on externalizing problems.
  • 13% of participants showed clinically significant externalizing problems.
  • 26% exhibited clinically elevated executive functions as per parent-report.
  • Executive functions and processing speed accounted for considerable variance in externalizing problems, particularly aggression and rule-breaking.

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Pediatric brain tumor survivors (PBTS) experience greater psychosocial and executive function (EF) challenges than peers and other cancer survivors, but much less is known about their risk for externalizing problems (EP). Cognitive deficits, including EF and processing speed (PS), predict EP in the general population, but this relationship has not been examined among PBTS. This study tested the hypothesis that problems with EF and PS will relate to EP among PBTS. Methods Neuropsychological data were abstracted from clinically referred PBTS (N = 177, 58.2% male, Mean age at diagnosis=6.26 yrs, SD = 4.67, Mean time since diagnosis=4.87 yrs, SD = 3.96). Data included BRIEF and CBCL parent-report, and an age-appropriate Wechsler Scale. Hierarchical regressions examined the effect of 1) demographic and disease factors, 2) parent-reported EF (GEC), and 3) working memory (WMI) and processing speed (PSI), on EP. Results Per parent-report, 13% of PBTS exhibited clinically significant EP (M = 49.71, SD = 11.53), and 26% exhibited clinically elevated GEC (M = 56.40, SD = 12.72). The final model explained 64.3% of EP (F(6, 117)=35.14, p0.001), with GEC (b = 0.76, p0.001) and PSI (b = 0.15, p=0.025) as significant predictors. For Aggression, the final step accounted for 57.2% of the variance, with significant effects of GEC (b = 0.72, p0.001) and PSI (b = 0.22, p=0.002). PSI added unique variance to Aggression (ΔR2=0.05, p = 0.002). The final model accounted for 42.5% of Rule-Breaking, with GEC (b = 0.64, p0.001) and PSI (b = 0.22, p=0.009) as significant predictors. PSI added unique variance to Rule-Breaking (ΔR2=0.04, p = 0.032). Conclusions Parent-reported EF and PS account for unique variance in EP among PBTS. Most survivors do not exhibit EP, but those with PS and EF difficulties appear at greater risk. These impairments may limit PBTS’ ability to navigate social and environmental demands, increasing frustration and impulsivity. Longitudinal surveillance of these potential risk factors could clarify temporal relationships in EP development and inform preventative intervention for PBTS.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sharkey et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4fc7fb39f7826a300d6d7https://doi.org/10.1093/neuped/wuaf001.248
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper