PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026Geophysical Research Letters3 citationsOpen Access

EOF‐Based Bias Correction of Near‐Surface Wind Speed Over China Reveals Stronger Future Trends and Variability

View Full Paper
YXYang XuHYHui‐Shuang YuanZSZhi‐Da Sun

Key Points

  • The research aims to correct biases in climate models predicting near-surface wind speed in China and project future trends.
  • Analyzed simulations from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6.
  • Used an empirical orthogonal function approach for bias correction.
  • Compared corrected projections to original model outputs.
  • Corrected projections show stronger future trends in near-surface wind speed over China.
  • Increased variability in near-surface wind speed is observed with corrections.
  • Unadjusted models significantly underestimate future changes in wind speed.

Abstract

Abstract As near‐surface wind speed (NSWS) largely controls wind power generation, robust projection is vital to wind energy planning and broader sustainability goals. However, the predictive skill of climate models for NSWS remains uncertain. Analysis of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 simulations shows that the models reproduce the mean NSWS over China reasonably well but substantially underestimate the observed long‐term trend and variability. Given these large biases, bias correction is essential for obtaining more reliable NSWS projections. We correct this bias using an Empirical Orthogonal Function approach to isolate the dominant spatial modes of NSWS variability. The corrected projections exhibit amplified future trends and increased variability of NSWS over China compared with the original model output, with the strongest changes emerging under higher greenhouse gas emissions. Our results indicated that unadjusted models may understate the magnitude of future NSWS changes. This study provides a more reliable reference for future evolution of NSWS.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4fc7fb39f7826a300d70chttps://doi.org/10.1029/2025gl120559
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Challenge and Bias Correction for Surface Wind Speed Prediction: A Case Study in Shanxi Province, China2025 · 1 citations
  2. 2Correction of Climate Model Winds With Preserved Spatio‐Temporal and Directional Consistency2026
  3. 3Projected near-surface wind speed and wind energy over Central Asia using dynamical downscaling with bias-corrected global climate models2024 · 7 citations
  4. 4Future Projection and Uncertainty Analysis of Wind and Solar Energy in China Based on an Ensemble of CORDEX‐EA‐II Regional Climate Simulations2024 · 10 citations
  5. 5Bias Correction of Wind Speed Forecasts Using an Explainable Machine Learning Method2026