This study assesses the environmental performance of three wastewater treatment setups through an attributional, gate-to-gate life cycle assessment (functional unit: 1 m3 of treated wastewater): (Sc1) a traditional municipal wastewater treatment plant, (Sc2) an aquaculture recirculation system using microalgae, and (Sc3) a domestic system combining UASB pretreatment with microalgae polishing. Inventory data were analyzed in SimaPro with ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (Hierarchist) across seven effect categories. Robustness was tested through sensitivity analyses (±20%) of power consumption and influent characteristics, as well as an additional scenario exploring the offset of methane-recovery electricity. The global warming impact remained consistent across scenarios, ranging from 60.5 to 65.1 kg CO2-eq·m−3, indicating no significant difference within the operational parameters. In most categories, power consumption and influent-related burdens were the main contributors, while the impacts from flocculants and microalgae inoculum were minimal. Sc3 showed a lower freshwater eutrophication potential compared to Sc1 and Sc2 (0.028 vs. approximately 0.049 kg P-eq·m−3). Normalization highlighted human carcinogenic toxicity and aquatic ecotoxicity as key impact categories. The methane-offset scenario caused only slight changes at low CH4 outputs, suggesting that energy recovery depends on context.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Janet B. García-Martínez
Laura T. Ríos Niño
Lizeth N. Saavedra Gómez
Environments
Sapienza University of Rome
Industrial University of Santander
Francisco de Paula Santander University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
García-Martínez et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69b6068883145bc643d1c87f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/environments13030155