Research on Highly Suspected True Alarm Model for Fire Alarm Data Based on Deep Learning Method

With the widespread application of automatic fire alarm systems in various types of buildings, the problem of fire false alarms has gradually become prominent, which not only causes resource waste, but also may reduce users’ trust in the alarm system, thereby affecting the efficiency of emergency response in actual fires. According to data from a certain fire cloud platform, 99.85% of the suspected fires predicted by its system are false alarms. Although existing models can recognize most fire accidents, the accuracy of fire alarm recognition is only 0.15%, due to loose judgment logic, which still requires a large amount of manpower to verify alarms. This article analyzes a large amount of false alarm data and explores the main causes of false alarms, including environmental interference, equipment failure, and improper human operation. By using a fire dynamics simulator (FDS) to establish fire simulation models under different data settings, horizontal and vertical multi-scene fire simulation data are obtained. The study combines simulation and platform data to form a fire and false alarm dataset using a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) and deep neural network (DNN) deep learning techniques to learn the deductive rules of the fire scene, establish a two-stage judgment model, and gradually, accurately, judge the results. By quantifying the precision, recall, and F1 score of the model, a deep learning model designed to accurately identify genuine fire alarms while filtering out false ones is proposed that can significantly reduce the false alarm rate. The results indicate that the model can identify 1705 false alarms out of 2255 highly suspected true alarms identified by existing systems in multiple practical scenarios and eliminate 75.61% of false positive alarms. On the premise of ensuring an authenticity recognition rate greater than 98%, the accuracy of fire alarm recognition increased from 0.15% to 28.85%, which will significantly reduce the workload of staff verifying alerts, and has good practical value.