What type of study is this?

This is a Systematic Review study.

What question did this study set out to answer?

To evaluate the performance of a custom GPT for full text screening in systematic reviews.

March 15, 2026Open Access

Evaluating the performance of a custom GPT in full text screening of a systematic review

Key Points

To evaluate the performance of a custom GPT for full text screening in systematic reviews.
Compared assistant cGPT to autonomous cGPT in screening performance.
Assessed speed and reliability of each model in systematic reviewing.
Assistant cGPT outperformed autonomous cGPT in full text screening.
Improved speed could enhance efficiency in systematic reviewing processes.

Abstract

The assistant cGPT outperformed the autonomous cGPT. An assistant cGPT could speed up systematic reviewing in a sufficiently reliable manner, however, further research is needed to establish standardized thresholds for practical use. Improved speed of systematic reviewing has implications for directing timely public health policy decisions.

Connected Papers

Building similarity graph...

Analyzing shared references across papers

Discussion

Authors

Rachel E. Davis

S. List

Kendal G. Chappell

Journals

Scandinavian Journal of Public Health

Actions

Institutions

University of Oslo

OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University

Østfold University College

References and Citations

Connected Papers

Building similarity graph...

Analyzing shared references across papers

Evaluating the performance of a custom GPT in full text screening of a systematic review

Key Points

Abstract

Citation Network

Connected Papers

Discussion

Authors

Journals

Actions

Institutions

References and Citations

Citation Network

Connected Papers

Discussion

Cite this study