PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 15, 2026PLoS ONE0 citationsOpen Access

Dense retrieval and reranking for referenced provisions in electric power audit systems

View Full Paper
QMQinglin MengYHYing HeSHSheharyar Hussain

Key Points

  • The aim is to enhance the retrieval of referenced provisions during electric power audits using a novel framework.
  • Developed a dense retrieval and reranking framework for referencing provisions.
  • Implemented a two-stage pipeline with a dense retriever and scoring model.
  • Incorporated audit issue category into the reranking process.
  • Experimented with a Chinese electric power audit text dataset.
  • Demonstrated effective retrieval of referenced provisions.
  • Showed improvements in accuracy through the proposed framework.

Abstract

Electric power audits require practitioners to describe an audit issue and justify the final opinion by citing an appropriate referenced provision. In practice, the referenced provision should be retrieved from an authoritative provision corpus rather than generated, because correctness and traceability are critical in audit workflows. This paper proposes a dense retrieval and reranking framework for referenced provision retrieval in electric power audit systems. The method follows a two-stage pipeline: a two-tower dense retriever efficiently recalls a small candidate set (top-20) from a large provision corpus, and a one-tower scoring model performs fine-grained reranking by jointly modeling the audit problem description and each candidate provision. To strengthen semantic matching under audit-specific contexts, the audit issue category is incorporated into the reranking input. Experiments are conducted on a Chinese electric power audit text dataset, demonstrating that the proposed retrieval–reranking design provides an effective and practical solution for accurate referenced provision retrieval.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Meng et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b606af83145bc643d1ce43https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0344683
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper