PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 15, 2026Feminism & Psychology0 citationsOpen Access

Rag doll or rebel? Recognising girl's body language as everyday resistance in discursive therapy with their female caregivers

View Full Paper
KRKatherine ReidLYLobna YassineAEAreana Eivers

Key Points

  • The study aims to analyze girls' body language as a form of resistance in therapy sessions with their caregivers.
  • Critical discourse analysis of two girls' therapy sessions.
  • Examination of body postures and their meanings in therapeutic interactions.
  • Application of Foucauldian power analysis to understand power dynamics.
  • Body language expressed by girls serves as a form of everyday resistance.
  • Findings indicate problematic identification of girls within deficit-focused interactions.
  • The use of physical space was noted as a means for the girls to resist positioning as docile bodies.

Abstract

Girls in Western countries are often sent to therapy to better manage their behaviour. Once in the therapy room, children often rely on nonverbal means to express their thoughts or feelings in therapy interactions. Children demonstrate their understandings of their mental health and awareness of their experiences through bodily postures. Yet there is limited literature that critically examines girls’ body language in therapy. The current study uses a critical discourse analysis to investigate reoccurring patterns of postures across two girls’ discursive therapy sessions. A Foucauldian power analysis illustrates girls’ body language is a form of everyday resistance to deficit-focused interactions. It shows how the girls were identified in problematic ways at times, and how they used their bodies to actively resist and reposition themselves in the therapeutic encounter by using the physical space around them. Findings demonstrate the need for professionals working in therapy contexts to critically examine the meaning of girls’ body language to avoid inadvertently positioning them as gendered docile bodies in need of modification and self-management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Reid et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b606af83145bc643d1cea1https://doi.org/10.1177/09593535261422509
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Precarious Epistemic Justice: Navigating the Politics of the Therapy Room With Children and Their Caregivers2025 · 1 citations
  2. 2Social Work and the Body2007 · 53 citations
  3. 3Responding to children’s ‘emotion talk’: a conversation analysis of a therapeutic encounter between a social worker and two siblings using child-centred play therapy2019 · 4 citations
  4. 4The slippery and the sane: Decolonizing psychology through a study of the Indian girl-child2020 · 18 citations
  5. 5Uttering2016 · 1 citations