PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 15, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Irreversible Compression Commitment: A Typed Axiomatic Framework for Evolution, Extraction, and Commitment

View Full Paper
CIClaudio Irrgang

Key Points

  • To introduce a framework for analyzing irreversible commitment processes and their structured dynamics.
  • Developed a typed axiomatic framework with defined types for commitment steps.
  • Decomposed commitment into three stages: deterministic flow, extraction of probabilities, and non-deterministic sampling.
  • Identified axioms that constrain the pipeline and explore implications of structural elements.
  • Established key relationships between boundary compression, non-invertibility, and commitment in the processes.
  • Showed that structural ingredients can be independently removed without losing essential properties.
  • Highlighted that the framework does not identify the physical mechanisms but offers a comparative analysis tool.

Abstract

This paper introduces Irreversible Compression Commitment (ICC), a typed axiomatic framework for sequential irreversible commitment processes. Each commitment step is decomposed into a three-stage pipeline with explicit domain and codomain types: deterministic flow on density matrices, deterministic many-to-one extraction of outcome probabilities, and non-deterministic sampling to a single committed outcome. Three axioms constrain the pipeline (finite distinguishability, boundary compression, and commitment decomposition), with compression stated at the finite boundary level of distinguishable inputs and outputs rather than on the continuous density-matrix interior. Under these axioms, the main theorem is structural. It establishes strict boundary compression, deterministic non-invertibility, sequential dependency, and irreversible commitment together with non-deterministic outcome selection. The contribution of the framework is not the discovery of a new dynamical law—but rather the formal isolation of a compact typed package sufficient for these consequences and the explicit tracking of which axioms support which results. Three targeted weakenings produce three distinct loss patterns, demonstrating that the structural ingredients are independently removable. The framework does not resolve the physical mechanism of single-outcome selection, and it does not establish that any physical system instantiates ICC. Rather, it provides an abstract target for comparing candidate realizations, weakened variants, and neighboring formal frameworks.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Claudio Irrgang (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b606c483145bc643d1d1b3https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19004431
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper