Abstract Background: Post-term pregnancy is associated with increased perinatal morbidity and mortality, necessitating induction of labour in many cases. The intracervical Foley catheter is a widely used mechanical method for cervical ripening, particularly in primigravida women with an unfavourable cervix. However, regional data on delivery and early neonatal outcomes remain limited. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted at the Federal Government Polyclinic Hospital, Islamabad, including 180 post-term (≥40+0 weeks) primigravida women undergoing induction with an intracervical Foley catheter. Baseline demographics, Bishop score, and obstetric history were recorded. Outcomes assessed were mode of delivery, one-minute Apgar score (<7), and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission within 24 hours. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and stratified by age and BMI. Results: The mean age of participants was 28.8 ± 4.7 years, mean BMI 22.2 ± 0.9 kg/m², and mean Bishop score 2.0 ± 0.4. Vaginal delivery occurred in 111 women (61.7%, 95% CI: 54.4–68.6), while 69 (38.3%, 95% CI: 31.4–45.6) required cesarean section. NICU admission was necessary for 7 neonates (3.9%, 95% CI: 1.6–7.8), and no neonate had a low Apgar score at one minute. Cesarean section rates were slightly higher among women aged 26–33 years and those with BMI 23–25 kg/m². Conclusion: Induction of labour with an intracervical Foley catheter in post-term primigravida women resulted in a favourable rate of vaginal delivery and minimal early neonatal complications. These findings support the Foley catheter as a safe and effective cervical ripening method in this high-risk population. Larger multicentre comparative studies are warranted to further define optimal induction strategies.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Dr. ZAHRA KAUSAR
Sabeen Aslam
Qundeel Rana
KPMG (United Kingdom)
Office of the Chief Medical Examiner
Surya University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
KAUSAR et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69b606ea83145bc643d1d7b2 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18998519