PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 15, 2026The Science of The Total Environment0 citationsOpen Access

A Bayesian inversion of TROPOMI methane observations over South Africa: Implications for bottom-up inventories

View Full Paper
KMKeneuoe MalieheJGJames GouldingSMStuart Marsh

Key Points

  • The research aims to assess methane emissions in South Africa using satellite observations and a Bayesian inversion approach.
  • Conducted an inverse analysis of 2019 methane emissions using TROPOMI satellite data.
  • Employed the cloud-based Integrated Methane Inversion v2 tool for calculations.
  • Utilized the EDGAR v8 greenhouse gas inventory as a reference for prior estimates.
  • Estimated 2019 methane emissions at 0.65 Tg yr −1, 62% lower than the prior estimate of 1.71 Tg yr −1.
  • Identified substantial discrepancies linked to uncertainties in emission factors for livestock.
  • Highlighted underestimation of methane emissions in agricultural regions and identified coal in Mpumalanga as a major driver of differences.

Abstract

We present the first inverse analysis of 2019 annual mean methane (CH 4 ) emissions in South Africa, focusing on a rectilinear region between the latitudes of 24°- 28° South and the longitudes of 26° - 30° East, containing large commercial agricultural fields, the biggest industries and urbanised environments. Using TROPOMI satellite observations and the cloud-based Integrated Methane Inversion v2 tool, we estimate CH 4 emissions at a spatial resolution of 25 × 25 km 2 . Our analysis employs the EDGAR v8 greenhouse gas inventory as the prior and produces a posterior estimate of 0.65 Tg CH 4 yr −1 — 62% lower than the original bottom-up inventory estimate. This substantial discrepancy is discussed in the context of potential uncertainties in emission factors and activity data, particularly for livestock-dominated regions, where relative prediction errors in cattle energy intake calculations can exceed 20%. The exclusion of biogenic sources in bottom-up inventories may also contribute to these differences, though such sources would likely increase, not decrease, anthropogenic emissions. These findings underscore the limitations of bottom-up approaches for accurate CH 4 emissions quantification. Our study contributes to global CH 4 research by providing the first satellite-based inverse analysis of CH 4 observations for South Africa and the first observational evaluation of the country's 2019 gridded CH 4 inventory from the Department of Forestry, Fisheries, and the Environment. • Satellite inversion of TROPOMI CH 4 over a regional domain in South Africa for 2019 • Posterior CH 4 estimate: 0.65 Tg yr −1 vs prior EDGAR v8 value of 1.71 Tg yr −1 • Spatial patterns indicate relative CH 4 underestimation in agricultural regions. • Coal in Mpumalanga identified as main driver of inventory–inversion difference

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Maliehe et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b64c67b42794e3e660da69https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2026.181650
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper