PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 15, 2026Cognition0 citationsOpen Access

Cognitive change without linguistic change: The rise of egocentric frames of reference in the Hai||om

View Full Paper
YKYağmur Deniz KısaRSRoman StengelinLMLuke Maurits

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore shifts in spatial thinking among the Hai||om people without changes in language.
  • Conducted comparative analysis of historical and contemporary data from the Hai||om community
  • Focused on preferences for egocentric versus geocentric frames of reference
  • Investigated the role of material culture in cognitive changes
  • Contemporary Hai||om show a greater preference for egocentric frames than in prior reports
  • No corresponding shift in linguistic use was documented
  • Findings suggest that material culture may drive shifts in spatial cognition

Abstract

Human cultures differ in how they think about space: some primarily use egocentric frames of reference, thinking about space in relation to the body, while others privilege geocentric frames, thinking about space in relation to the environment. The origins of this cognitive diversity remain largely unknown. Here, we provide evidence suggesting an ongoing shift in spatial thinking—but not language—within a culture, providing insight into the origins of this cognitive diversity. Hai||om people, a rural forager community in Namibia, have traditionally privileged geocentric frames of reference in cognition and language. Comparing new data to historical data from the same community, we found that contemporary Hai||om show a greater preference for egocentric frames of reference compared to previous reports, suggesting an egocentric shift in their cognition. Surprisingly, we document no such shift in their language, showing that Whorfian views are insufficient on their own to explain cognitive diversity in spatial frames of reference. We discuss material culture, rather than language, as a key driver of diversity in spatial thought.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kısa et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b64c67b42794e3e660db83https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106522
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Language as context, language as means: Spatial cognition and habitual language use1995 · 178 citations
  2. 2Human spatial representation: insights from animals2002 · 648 citations
  3. 3Original Power Pointing: Legibility and Opacity in the Deictic Field2021 · 7 citations
  4. 4brms : An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Stan2017 · 9,835 citations
  5. 5Different reference frames on different axes: Space and language in indigenous Amazonians2022 · 10 citations