PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 15, 2026Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology0 citationsOpen Access

Multinomial risk modeling of osteopenia and osteoporosis in Iraqi women: comparative contributions of osteoprotegerin and vitamin D3

View Full Paper
MAManal Jasim AbboodAAAmer H. Abdullah

Key Points

  • The study aims to assess the roles of vitamin D and other endocrine factors in the risk of osteopenia and osteoporosis among Iraqi women, particularly pre- and post-menopause.
  • Conducted a cross-sectional analysis with 120 women categorized into control, osteopenia, and osteoporosis groups based on DEXA T-scores.
  • Measured serum levels of vitamin D3, osteoprotegerin, estradiol, and parathyroid hormone using ELISA.
  • Performed statistical analysis using ANOVA and multinomial logistic regression to estimate odds ratios while controlling for age and BMI.
  • In premenopausal women, OPG and E2 levels were significantly lower in osteopenia and osteoporosis groups compared to controls.
  • In postmenopausal women, OPG was significantly lower in osteoporosis compared to both controls and osteopenia.
  • Osteoprotegerin was found to be strongly protective against both osteoporosis and osteopenia risk, while vitamin D3 had a modest protective association with osteoporosis.

Abstract

Vitamin D status is frequently low among Iraqi women, which may limit its discriminatory value for osteopenia (ON) and osteoporosis (OP). We evaluated the vitamin D axis (VD3, DBP, and VDR), osteoprotegerin (OPG), and endocrine regulators (estradiol E2 and parathyroid hormone PTH) in relation to ON/OP risk before and after menopause. In this cross-sectional study, 120 women were classified as control, ON, or OP (n = 40 each) based on DEXA-derived T-scores. Serum VD3, DBP, VDR, OPG, E2, and PTH were measured by ELISA. Group comparisons were conducted using ANOVA with post hoc testing, and adjusted odds ratios (OR) for ON and OP were estimated using multinomial logistic regression, controlling for age and BMI. In premenopausal women, E2 and OPG were significantly lower in ON and OP than in controls (E2: p < 0.001; OPG: p = 0.001), whereas VD3, VDR, and DBP did not differ significantly. In postmenopausal women, OPG was markedly lower in OP than in controls and ON (p < 0.001), while VDR and DBP remained non-significant; VD3 showed a decreasing trend in OP (p = 0.042). In adjusted multinomial regression, OPG was strongly protective against OP (OR 0.275; 95% CI 0.172–0.441; p < 0.001) and against ON (OR 0.724; 95% CI 0.538–0.973; p = 0.033). E2 was protective against OP (OR 0.491; 95% CI 0.356–0.676; p < 0.001) and against ON (OR 0.748; 95% CI 0.608–0.920; p = 0.006). VD3 showed a modest protective association with OP (OR 0.948; 95% CI 0.901–0.998; p = 0.040) but not with ON, while PTH was a slight risk factor for OP (OR 1.027; 95% CI 1.004–1.051; p = 0.021). In Iraqi women, particularly after menopause, OPG (and E2) showed a stronger and more consistent association with OP/ON risk than VD3, whereas DBP and VDR were not informative in this cohort. These findings support OPG as a promising biomarker for osteoporosis risk stratification in populations with prevalent vitamin D insufficiency.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Abbood et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b64d48b42794e3e660e16ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgeb.2026.100681
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper