PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 15, 2026Radiation Protection Dosimetry0 citationsOpen Access

Assessing the influence of kernel selection on chest computed tomography image quality across varying dose levels using TrueFidelity reconstruction

View Full Paper
EGEleftheria GiankoMDMicael Oliveira DinizWRWalter Cifuentes Ramirez

Key Points

  • The study aims to assess how different reconstruction kernels impact the quality of chest CT images at varying dose levels.
  • Evaluated chest CT scans from 25 patients
  • Used TrueFidelity software with Standard and Lung kernels
  • Conducted Visual Grading Characteristics analysis comparing image quality
  • Assessed images at full-dose (2.5 mSv) and ultra-low-dose (0.05 mSv)
  • Standard kernel achieved better image quality at full-dose for six structures
  • No statistically significant differences observed between kernels at ultra-low-dose
  • Most full-dose images rated as acceptable, while ultra-low-dose images often rated as probably acceptable or unacceptable

Abstract

Deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) utilizes neural networks to generate high-quality computed tomography (CT) images. One commercially available DLIR software is TrueFidelity from GE Healthcare. The Standard kernel was the only available reconstruction kernel previously, but recently other kernels, including the Lung kernel, have been introduced by GE. This study aimed to evaluate the image quality of chest CT scans acquired at full-dose (FD, 2.5 mSv) and ultra-low-dose (ULD, 0.05 mSv) when reconstructed using TrueFidelity with both Standard and Lung kernels. Twenty-five patients underwent chest CT scans at Sahlgrenska University Hospital. The images were reconstructed and then evaluated by four radiologists in two different studies, one including ULD CT axial images and the other one the FDCT. Visual Grading Characteristics (VGC) analysis was applied, using the Standard kernel as reference and the area under the VGC curve (AUCVGC) for comparison. At FD, the Standard kernel yielded better results regarding the visualization of six structures and the general image quality. However, in ULD scans, the differences between kernels were not statistically significant. The FD images were mostly rated as acceptable, while ULD images were often rated as probably acceptable or unacceptable, especially for emphysema assessment. Overall, TrueFidelity seems to perform better with the Standard kernel than with the Lung kernel in FD protocols, but no reliable conclusions can be drawn for the ULD protocol.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gianko et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b64d5cb42794e3e660e417https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncaf143
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper