PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 17, 2026Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal0 citationsOpen Access

Non-Invasive Programmed Stimulation to Confirm Left Bundle Branch Capture During Outpatient Follow-Up: a Case Report

View Full Paper
LMLeonardo MarinaccioGUGiorgia UgoliniFVFrancesco Vetta

Key Points

  • This report aims to showcase a non-invasive method for confirming left bundle branch capture during outpatient follow-up.
  • Use of a dual-chamber pacemaker in a 70-year-old male with paroxysmal 2:1 atrioventricular block

Structured PICO

Does non-invasive programmed stimulation (NIPS) confirm left bundle branch capture in outpatients when conventional criteria are inconclusive?

P
Population
1 70-year-old Caucasian male with symptomatic paroxysmal 2:1 atrioventricular block and LVEF 48%, one month post dual-chamber pacemaker implantation with ambiguous left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) capture.
I
Intervention
Non-invasive programmed stimulation (NIPS) via a pacemaker programmer using extra stimuli.
O
Outcome
Confirmation of left bundle branch (LBB) capture (transition from non-selective to selective LBB capture).surrogate

Non-invasive programmed stimulation via a device programmer can safely confirm left bundle branch capture in outpatient settings when standard ECG criteria are ambiguous.

Abstract

Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a physiological pacing technique that ensures near-normal ventricular activation. However, confirming left bundle branch (LBB) capture during follow up can be challenging when standard criteria are inconclusive. This report describes the use of non-invasive programmed stimulation (NIPS) via a pacemaker programmer to confirm LBB capture in an outpatient setting. We describe a 70-year-old Caucasian male who received a dual-chamber pacemaker (Zenex DR, Abbott, Sylmar, CA, USA) for symptomatic paroxysmal 2:1 atrioventricular block with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 48%. One month after implantation, LBBAP capture could not be confirmed using conventional criteria because of atypical QRS morphology. NIPS was safely performed using the device programmer. Programmed stimulation with extra stimuli induced a transition from non-selective to selective LBB capture, demonstrated by prolongation of the V1 R-wave peak time and changes in QRS morphology. No arrhythmias occurred during the test. This case illustrates the practical application of the principles of programmed stimulation in an outpatient setting to confirm LBB capture, especially in ambiguous cases where conventional criteria are inconclusive.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Marinaccio et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b8ef52deb47d591b8c55c5https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2026.03.003
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper