PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 17, 2026Journal of Hazardous Materials0 citationsOpen Access

A Systematic Review of Micro- and Nanoplastics Impact on Plant Photosynthesis

View Full Paper
KKKristina KraljZCZhongbing Chen

Key Points

  • This review aims to synthesize existing literature on the effects of micro- and nanoplastics on plant photosynthesis, highlighting physiological and genetic changes.
  • Conducted a structured literature review of existing studies on microplastics and plant photosynthesis.
  • Combined qualitative synthesis with quantitative data extraction from experiments.
  • Assessed changes in photosynthetic pigments, gas exchange, and chlorophyll fluorescence.
  • Chlorophyll levels decreased by 8-12% primarily under polystyrene exposure and fine particle sizes (0.1-1 µm).
  • Carotenoids exhibited significant sensitivity as well, particularly with larger particles and higher concentrations.
  • Gas exchange showed considerable decline, with polystyrene negatively impacting stomatal conductance and net photosynthesis.
  • Electron transport rate (ETR) was consistently sensitive to microplastics, indicating stress responses.

Abstract

Despite rapidly growing research activity, the effects of micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) on plant photosynthesis remain inconsistently described, with major discrepancies across species, particle types, sizes, and experimental conditions. Current literature lacks an integrated synthesis that identifies general physiological patterns and quantifies the magnitude of MNP-induced disruptions. To address this gap, this review combines a structured literature review with quantitative evaluation of extracted experimental data to assess MNP-induced changes in photosynthetic pigments, gas exchange, and chlorophyll fluorescence, as well as associated metabolic and genetic responses. Our data analysis shows that PS was the most frequently reported polymer, followed by PE, PVC, PET, PP, and PES, while plant representation was dominated by Poaceae and Cucurbitaceae . Chlorophyll declined most strongly under 0.1–1 µm particles at high concentrations and under PS exposure, with median reductions of 8 and 12%, reflecting disruptions in pigment synthesis, degradation, and thylakoid damage. Carotenoids proved even more sensitive, showing the largest decreases under >100 µm particles, high concentrations, and PS treatments, particularly in aquatic systems, yet they also displayed occasional stimulation at low doses, consistent with their dual role in both protection and photochemistry. Gas-exchange responses pointed to biochemical limitations at high MNP levels, with PS again exerting the strongest suppression of stomatal conductance and net photosynthesis. Among fluorescence parameters, ETR emerged as the most sensitive indicator of MNP stress. The review concludes by shedding light on the possibilities that may help alleviate impact of MNPs and pointing toward the studies still needed to fully understand how MNPs alter photosynthetic function. • Polymer use in reviewed studies: PS > PE > PVC > PET > PP > PES • Pigments altered via shifts in synthesis, degradation, and thylakoid damage • Polystyrene causes the strongest declines in pigments and gas exchange • Low MNP doses often triggered mild stimulation of photosynthetic parameters • Electron transport rate (ETR) declined consistently across studies

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kralj et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b8ef52deb47d591b8c5607https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2026.141776
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper