PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 17, 2026The Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases0 citationsOpen Access

Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles Prioritized by the World Health Organization and Mortality in Bloodstream Infections Caused by Enterobacter Cloacae Complex: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

View Full Paper
JPJaysa PizziBABeatriz ArnsGGGreici Taiane Gunzel

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the impact of antimicrobial resistance profiles on mortality in bloodstream infections caused by Enterobacter cloacae complex.
  • Multicenter, retrospective cohort study design
  • Inclusion of adult patients with bloodstream infections caused by Enterobacter cloacae complex
  • Analysis of antimicrobial adequacy based on WHO priority resistance groups
  • Univariate analysis and hierarchical Cox model to assess risk factors for mortality
  • Out of 429 analyzed cases, mortality rates were 21% (WHO 1), 25% (WHO 2), and 35% (WHO 3)
  • WHO 3 group had lower frequency of adequate therapy; however, adjusted analysis showed equalized mortality risk among groups
  • Inclusion of adequate definitive therapy showed WHO 3 associates with lower mortality risk

Abstract

To evaluate the mortality of bloodstream infections (BSI) caused by Enterobacter cloacae complex (ECC) according to the resistance profile prioritized by the World Health Organization (WHO). Multicenter, retrospective cohort study. Adults with BSI caused by ECC were included. Duplicates, missing data, and hospital stays ≤ 2 days were excluded. Data were obtained from medical records. The outcome was 30-day mortality. Antimicrobials initiated within 7 days of BSI onset and maintained for ≥ 2 days were evaluated for adequacy (defined according to in vitro susceptibility). ECC isolates were divided into three groups according to WHO priority resistance profile: susceptible to third-generation cephalosporins and carbapenems (WHO 1); resistant to third-generation cephalosporins and susceptible to carbapenems (WHO 2); and resistant to carbapenems (WHO 3). Two univariate analyses were performed (#1 between WHO groups and #2 between deaths and survivors). Variables with P < 0.20 were included in a hierarchical Cox model. From January 2012 to December 2023, 858 patients were screened; 241 were excluded due to duplicate isolates, 173 due to hospitalization < 2 days, 4 for being under 18 years old, and 11 due to missing data, resulting in 429 analyzed cases: WHO 1: 300 (70%), WHO 2: 103 (24%), WHO 3: 26 (6%). Mortality was 21%, 25%, and 35% among patients with ECC BSI WHO 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P = 0.20). In univariate analysis #1, the groups differed in high-risk primary site and ICU admission (more frequent in WHO 3), and in adequate empirical and definitive therapy (less frequent in WHO 3). In univariate analysis #2, age, Charlson score, Pitt score, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), vasoactive drug use (VAD), high-risk site, and polymicrobial infection were associated with mortality. Deaths received less adequate empirical and definitive therapy. In the hierarchical multivariate analysis, adjustment for age, comorbidities (Charlson, GFR), and infection severity (high-risk site, VAD, polymicrobial infection) equalized the risk of death among patients with ECC BSI WHO 1, 2, and 3. After including definitive adequate therapy, WHO 3 was associated with a lower risk of mortality (hazard ratio 0.47; 95% CI 0.20–0.93; P = 0.03). The hierarchical multivariate analysis of our study suggests that the higher crude mortality of ECC BSI observed in the WHO 3 group was associated with greater clinical severity and lower frequency of adequate antimicrobial therapy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pizzi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b8ef6ddeb47d591b8c5782https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2026.104701
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper