PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 17, 2026BMC Research Notes0 citationsOpen Access

Diagnostic and prognostic utility of neutrophil CD64 and monocyte HLA-DR in adult sepsis patients

KAKajal AroraSKSusheel KumarMSMan Updesh Singh Sachdeva

Key Points

  • The study aims to assess the diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of neutrophil CD64 and monocyte HLA-DR in patients with sepsis.
  • Conducted a prospective observational study with 50 patients diagnosed with sepsis, 25 non-septic patients, and 25 healthy controls.
  • Performed flowcytometric estimation of neutrophil CD64 and monocyte HLA-DR on the day of admission.
  • Calculated sensitivity and specificity for diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers.
  • Patients with sepsis showed significantly higher neutrophil CD64 and lower monocyte HLA-DR than control groups (p < 0.001).
  • Neutrophil CD64 demonstrated a sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 74% at a cutoff value.
  • The combination of biomarkers increased sensitivity to 96%, with almost 100% sensitivity using all three markers.

Abstract

To evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of nCD64, mHLA-DR and sepsis Index (SI), ratio of nCD64 and mHLA-DR, in patients with sepsis. Prospective observational study was undertaken among 50 cases diagnosed with sepsis, 25 non-septic patients, and 25 healthy individuals as controls. Participants underwent flowcytometric estimation of nCD64 and mHLA-DR on the day of admission. The sepsis cohort had significantly higher nCD64 and lower mHLA-DR expression than both control groups (p-value: < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of nCD64 ABC (Antibodies Bound per Cell) for diagnosis of sepsis with a cut-off of 1152.16 was 94% and 74%, respectively. Similarly, for the Sepsis Index (cutoff-11.36), the sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of sepsis were 88% and 86%, respectively. The combination of sepsis index or CD64 (either positive) increased the sensitivity to 96%. Using the combination of all three markers (nCD64 ABC, mHLA-DR ABC, and SI), the sensitivity for diagnosis of sepsis approached 100%. Among flow cytometric variables, the sepsis index had a statistically significant association with hospital mortality on univariate analysis. However, overall, only the baseline SOFA score was independently associated with hospital mortality. nCD64 and sepsis index are good diagnostic markers in patients with sepsis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Arora et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b8f10fdeb47d591b8c5e86https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-026-07730-9
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)2016 · 28,810 citations
  2. 2COVID-19 Is Not Over and Needs Prediction Scores: An Endless Road!2021 · 6 citations
  3. 3Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock*2006 · 6,182 citations
  4. 4Monitoring Temporary Immunodepression by Flow Cytometric Measurement of Monocytic HLA-DR Expression: A Multicenter Standardized Study2005 · 248 citations
  5. 5Usefulness of Procalcitonin as a Marker of Systemic Infection in Emergency Department Patients: A Prospective Study2002 · 180 citations