PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 17, 2026Congenital Anomalies0 citations

Prevalence of Congenital Abnormalities in Abortuses and Stillbirths in India: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

View Full Paper
SDSushant Swaroop DasSSSonia SharmaRMReeha Mahajan

Key Points

  • This research aims to estimate the pooled prevalence of congenital abnormalities in abortuses and stillbirths across India.
  • Conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA 2020 guidelines.
  • Included 22 hospital-based studies from 1967 to 2024.
  • Utilized random-effects model for meta-analysis in Review Manager software.
  • Performed subgroup analyses by fetal outcome, publication year, and diagnostic method.
  • Assessed publication bias using funnel plots and Egger's test.
  • Pooled prevalence of congenital abnormalities in fetal losses was 0.21 (95% CI: 0.17–0.25).
  • Higher prevalence in abortuses (0.38) compared to stillbirths (0.12).
  • Autopsy-based studies reported a prevalence of 0.26, versus 0.09 for non-autopsy studies.
  • Central nervous system anomalies had the highest prevalence at 0.42, followed by multiple anomalies at 0.37.
  • The Central region showed the highest prevalence at 0.66, while the North-East had the lowest at 0.03.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Congenital abnormalities (CAs) are a major contributor to perinatal mortality and morbidity in India, particularly among abortuses and stillbirths. Despite the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, India, introducing stillbirth surveillance guidelines, national data on the burden of CAs remain limited. This systematic review and meta‐analysis aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of CAs in fetal losses and assess variations by organ system, region, and diagnostic approach. A comprehensive search following PRISMA 2020 guidelines was conducted in PubMed and Google Scholar. Twenty‐two hospital‐based studies published between 1967 and 2024 were included. Data were critically appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute's Critical Appraisal checklist. Meta‐analysis was performed in Review Manager software using a random‐effects model. Subgroup analyses explored differences by fetal outcome, publication year, diagnostic method, and geographic region, while publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger's test. The pooled prevalence of CAs in fetal losses was 0.21 (95% CI: 0.17–0.25), higher among abortuses (0.38) than stillbirths (0.12) and in autopsy‐based studies (0.26) than non‐autopsy studies (0.09). Central nervous system anomalies were most frequent (0.42), followed by multiple anomalies (0.37). The Central region reported the highest prevalence (0.66) and the North‐East the lowest (0.03). The findings highlight the need for consistent surveillance, improved diagnostic methods, and preventive strategies—particularly periconceptional folic acid supplementation and integration of CA reporting into national programmes—to reduce fetal losses and enhance maternal and child health outcomes in India and similar low‐ and middle‐income settings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Das et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b8f11edeb47d591b8c5ee5https://doi.org/10.1002/cga.70050
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper