PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 17, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Modulation of feedback-related negativity by objective and subjective response correctness

YMYasuhisa MaruyamaKAKeita AoyamaOFOsamu Fukayama

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore how the feedback-related negativity (FRN) is influenced by both objective and subjective correctness of responses.
  • EEG recorded from 28 participants during a digit-entering task
  • Single-trial EEG analysis using linear mixed-effects models
  • Inclusion of trials with false feedback to assess FRN modulation
  • FRN amplitudes were modulated by objective response correctness
  • Response time in subsequent trials was influenced by objective correctness
  • Behavioral measures did not fully align with ERN or FRN patterns

Abstract

Monitoring actions and outcomes is essential for flexible adaptation to environmental demands. Information about errors is important regardless of whether it is internally generated or externally signaled. Following incorrect responses, an event-related potential (ERP) component known as error-related negativity (ERN) appears in electroencephalographic (EEG) signals and reflects activity of the performance monitoring system located in the posterior medial frontal cortex (pMFC). Another ERP component associated with performance monitoring, feedback-related negativity (FRN), has been shown to process feedback stimuli related to performance errors. However, unlike the ERN, which is elicited by errors that may not reach conscious awareness, it remains unclear whether the FRN is modulated by unconsciously perceived errors. To examine modulation of the FRN by objective and subjective response correctness, EEG was recorded from 28 participants performing a digit-entering task that included trials with false feedback. Single-trial EEG analysis using linear mixed-effects models revealed that FRN amplitudes were modulated by objective response correctness after controlling for subjective reports of error certainty. Response time in the subsequent trial was also influenced by objective correctness, although no behavioral measure fully aligned with ERN or FRN patterns. These findings suggest a common representation of objective correctness in response- and feedback-related pMFC activity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Maruyama et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b8f13ddeb47d591b8c62aehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-43451-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper