The Greater Toronto Airports Authority is undertaking a major capital development initiative at Toronto Pearson International Airport known as Pearson Long-term Investment in Facilities and Terminals (Pearson LIFT). Pearson LIFT is designed to transform the airport into the world-class, sustainable and passenger-centric hub which will be needed in the coming decades. This paper examines the mechanisms established to manage the complexity of this transformation, focusing on two interrelated new initiatives that have been implemented by the airport company: the Single Point of Contact (SPOC) Cabinet governance model and the Interface Coordination Group (ICG). Drawing on programme management principles, systems theory, organisational design and infrastructure governance, this paper analyses how these bodies function to mediate interdepartmental coordination, mitigate operational risk and ensure strategic alignment across multiple aviation capital programmes, some of which are executed simultaneously in a live airport environment. The SPOC Cabinet operates as a senior-level forum, facilitating cross-functional collaboration, critical decision endorsements and escalation pathways to the Executive Capital Committee. In contrast, the ICG serves as a tactical coordination mechanism, using a centralised airport activity calendar and structured conflict resolution guidelines to manage programme and airport operational activities. Through an analysis of both initiatives, their methodologies and governance structures, this paper argues that the SPOC–ICG model represents a new way of managing complex aviation infrastructure delivery in operationally constrained airport environments. The findings contribute to the literature on aviation megaproject delivery and offer a replicable framework for other complex, multi-stakeholder aviation programmes seeking to balance strategic oversight with operational agility. This article is also included in The Business & Management Collection which can be accessed at https://hstalks.com/business/.
Pulla et al. (2026) studied this question.