This paper interprets David Lynch’s L.A. trilogy—especially its final installment, Inland Empire (2006)—as a critique of narrative subjectification and auteur theory. While Lynch himself is often framed as an autonomous auteur, the trilogy stages the pitfalls of precisely this mode of authorship-subjectivity: in all three films, protagonists traumatically disintegrate when narrative identity becomes untenable. In Inland Empire, this traumatic experience becomes a formal structure undermining spatiotemporal continuity, causality, and self-identical characters. While some critics see the film’s unreadability as a failure, this paper argues that it is its core poetic intervention: a post-narrative aesthetics, immersing the viewer into the trauma of ‘losing one’s plot,’ while also hinting at alternative life forms beyond narrative identity and auteurism.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Emil Egenbauer (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69ba421b4e9516ffd37a210c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/24632
Emil Egenbauer
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...