This study presents a machine learning framework for the reconstruction of fatigue life and fracture toughness in natural fiber-reinforced composites, evaluating the predictive accuracy of six regression algorithms—Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Machine, Neural Network, Ridge Regression, and Lasso Regression—using a controlled synthetic dataset of 600 samples generated from established Basquin fatigue and Rule of Mixtures fracture equations, incorporating stochastic noise calibrated to experimental scatter (CV = 15–50%), with log-normal noise standard deviation of 0.20 for fatigue life and Gaussian noise standard deviation of 0.15 for fracture toughness. The dataset encompasses eight natural fiber types (flax, jute, sisal, hemp, bamboo, coconut, banana, and pineapple) and five matrix systems (epoxy, polyester, PLA, vinyl ester, and polyurethane). Models were evaluated using a 70-15-15 train–validation–test split with 5-fold cross-validation and exhaustive grid search hyperparameter optimisation. Gradient Boosting achieved R2 = 0.93 for fatigue life and Stacking Ensemble achieved R2 = 0.87 for fracture toughness, representing 97% and 89% of their respective noise-ceiling values (theoretical maximum R2 of 0.96 and 0.98 given the programmed noise levels). The ML models perform supervised function approximation—learning to reconstruct the programmed generation equations rather than discovering novel physical composite behaviour—and function as automated surrogates for the governing equations. Feature importance analysis identified engineered composite indicators, stress amplitude, and fiber length as the most influential parameters. The framework provides a reproducible ML evaluation pipeline as a methodological template for future experimental composite studies.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Saurabh Tiwari
Ambika Gupta
Materials
Yeungnam University
Sunchon National University
Galgotias University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Tiwari et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69ba424e4e9516ffd37a2664 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19061131
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: