We observe that the extended Randall-Sundrum framework with D = 11 dimensions, N = 7 spokes, and kL = 37 warp depth is arithmetically closed under the prime set 2, 3, 7. Every rational quantity in the framework — coupling ratios, mixing angles, dark matter fraction, nuclear binding coefficients, and the fine-structure constant itself — factors over these three primes. No other prime appears in any multiplicative structure. The fine-structure constant decomposes exactly as 1/α = 2N + 3² + 1/ (2² × 7), and this decomposition uniquely selects kL = 37 as the warp depth at which the exponents refer back to the geometry’s own structural parameters. The dark matter fraction (observed 84. 3±0. 3%) is computed from the Euler factor at p = 7 in the Dedekind zeta function of Q (ζ7): (6/7) × (1 − 7−2) = 288/343 = 25 × 3²/7³ = 83. 97% (0. 3% error). The (1+α) correction appearing four times across 120 orders of magnitude is identified as the leading contribution of the 7-adic propagator, dominated by the p = 2 Euler factor at s = N. The SEMF coefficients governing nuclear binding (denominators 9, 8, 6, 63), iron-56 = 2³ × 7, and the magic numbers 28 = 2² × 7 and 126 = 2 × 3² × 7 inherit the spoke geometry’s adelic structure. (Four of the seven nuclear magic numbers factor over 2, 3, 7; the remaining three — 20, 50, 82 — do not and are identified as an open question in Section XIII. ) The error hierarchy — percent-level for topological observables, sub-percent for spectral, sub-ppm for couplings — matches the Euler product structure with exponent s increasing from s ≈ 2 (topological) to s ≈ kL (coupling). The framework’s 19 Standard Model parameters reduce to three structural numbers built from two seed primes. The arithmetic of the universe is the arithmetic of 2, 3.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Clay Barkley
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Clay Barkley (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69ba427c4e9516ffd37a2bba — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19056892
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: