ABSTRACT Self‐reported motives for residential immobility are important for understanding why people remain in place, yet existing survey measures vary widely and suffer from a lack of standardisation. We review self‐report measures about motives for immobility or constraints to moving—measured with survey items asking what made it difficult for respondents to relocate—in ten existing surveys. We report several advantages and disadvantages of different approaches and provide recommendations for future questionnaire design. Based on descriptive statistics from available survey measures and on the wording of the questions and response options, we pinpoint situations where questionnaire design rather than respondents' true motivations might influence answer patterns. We provide eight recommendations to guide future research design, focusing on question wording, sample selection, and response options and structure. This review provides a starting point for standardizing the measurement of immobility motives, enabling future researchers to make informed research design decisions and improve cross‐study comparability.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Clara H. Mulder
Brian Joseph Gillespie
Tialda Haartsen
Population Space and Place
University of Groningen
Erasmus University Rotterdam
Dialyse Centrum Groningen
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mulder et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69ba427c4e9516ffd37a2cda — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.70240