This paper applies the Dynamic Harmony structural stress-test framework to language and semiotic systems, evaluating whether the emergence of symbolic representation satisfies the requirements of the five-phase emergence grammar. The analysis focuses on the transition from non-symbolic signaling systems to fully developed symbolic language, including the emergence of structured representation, syntax, and shared meaning. These transitions are treated as candidate instances of ontological emergence rather than incremental extensions of pre-symbolic communication systems. Two formal instruments are deployed. The Phase-Skip Test evaluates whether the five-phase sequence is instantiated in the correct structural order. The State Space Redefinition Test (SSRT) evaluates whether the transition constitutes a redefinition of the system’s admissible state space, rather than reconfiguration within an existing communicative regime. Language and semiotic systems are analyzed as constraint-bound architectures in which symbols, rules of combination, and interpretive frameworks define the permissible space of representation and communication. Destabilization is characterized as the breakdown or insufficiency of purely indexical or signal-based systems, while Binding is evaluated in terms of the formation of stable symbol-meaning associations across agents. The analysis shows that the emergence of symbolic language involves structural reorganization that cannot be reduced to incremental increases in signaling complexity. Instead, it requires the formation of new constraint systems governing representation, interpretation, and combinatorial structure, consistent with Type 2 emergence under Dynamic Harmony. The paper contributes to linguistics, semiotics, and cognitive science by providing a formal structural framework for distinguishing between complex signaling systems and true symbolic emergence, clarifying the conditions under which language constitutes a genuine phase transition in system organization.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
James C. Scott
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
James C. Scott (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69ba428e4e9516ffd37a2f47 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19057902