Wind-induced noise remains a critical engineering challenge for MEMS microphones in compact consumer electronics such as smartphones, where spatial constraints limit conventional noise control solutions. This study experimentally investigates the suppression of flow-induced wind noise by a straight tube serving as the front cavity of a microphone, using a precision measurement microphone for data acquisition. Controlled experiments were conducted in both a flow duct for parametric isolation and an anechoic chamber for real-world validation. Results demonstrate a strong diameter-dependent effect: for a 1 mm diameter, increasing tube length significantly reduces noise power spectral density and steepens high-frequency roll-off via enhanced internal viscous and thermal dissipation. This effect weakens for a 2 mm diameter and becomes negligible for a 3 mm diameter, where noise is dominated by external flow excitation at the tube inlet rather than internal propagation. Therefore, extending tube length is an effective noise control strategy only for small-diameter cavities. Furthermore, while increased wind speed and oblique incidence elevate PSD, a longer tube reduces this sensitivity. Because acoustic transmission loss—including potential effects like aperture diffraction and impedance mismatch—was not measured, any resulting improvement in the effective signal-to-noise ratio is strictly presented as a hypothesis requiring future electroacoustic validation. The consistent findings across both experimental environments provide clear design guidance: for compact MEMS microphone systems in portable devices, elongating the front cavity is a viable passive noise control method only when the cavity diameter is sufficiently small (<2 mm). This offers a practical, space-efficient alternative to traditional windscreen-based approaches in portable devices.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chengpu Sun
Shiyu Wei
Bilong Liu
Micromachines
Qingdao University of Technology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sun et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69ba42ee4e9516ffd37a3aee — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/mi17030357
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: