ABSTRACT The evolving complexity of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) care demands innovative educational strategies that go beyond traditional didactic teaching. This narrative review, authored by the ECCO Education Committee, presents a comprehensive framework for modernising IBD education through the integration of active learning methodologies, digital platforms, simulation technologies and robust evaluation models. We review the evidence supporting learner‐centred approaches such as case‐based learning (CBL), team‐based learning (TBL), and structured problem‐solving, which foster clinical reasoning, reflective practice and collaborative decision‐making—skills essential for managing chronic multifaceted conditions such as IBD. The paper highlights the growing role of digital tools, including e‐learning platforms, video conferencing and assessment technologies, in expanding access, personalising content and supporting both professional and patient education. Gamification and microlearning are discussed as emerging modalities that enhance engagement, knowledge retention and self‐management, with applications for both clinicians and patients. Simulation‐based training (SIM), particularly in endoscopy and gastrointestinal ultrasound (GIUS), is shown to improve procedural competence and patient safety, whereas blended learning models offer scalable longitudinal pathways for skill development. The article also addresses the importance of rigorous evaluation, advocating for the use of frameworks such as the Kirkpatrick and CIPP models to link educational interventions to measurable improvements in clinical practice and patient outcomes. Key challenges—including faculty development, curricular alignment, infrastructure and standardisation of advanced IBD training—are identified, with recommendations for overcoming these barriers. Ultimately, the paper calls for cohesive evidence‐based educational programmes that empower learners at all levels to deliver high‐quality empathetic IBD care. The future of IBD education lies not in isolated innovations but in the consistent implementation of blended learner‐centred strategies that are responsive to the evolving needs of both healthcare professionals and patients.
Restellini et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: