PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 19, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Secure authentication using a multidimensional retinal biometric encryption method

YBYashmin BanuBRBiplab Kumar RathDGDebasis Gountia

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a retinal biometric encryption framework to improve authentication security by generating independent cryptographic keys.
  • Developed a multidimensional retinal encryption framework generating three keys from retinal vessel maps.
  • Used preprocessing techniques including CLAHE, vessel segmentation, and skeletonization to extract stable endpoints.
  • Combined distance measures into polyalphabetic key streams for encryption and decryption processes.
  • Demonstrated significantly increased brute-force key guessing times compared to single-key methods.
  • Achieved near-maximal key entropy from retinal samples, enhancing overall security.
  • Highlighted limitations related to image quality affecting the encryption process.

Abstract

Biometric encryption integrates physiological traits with cryptographic operations to improve authentication security. Retinal vasculature is particularly attractive due to its internal protection, permanence, and high inter-subject variability. we present a revised and rigorously justified multidimensional retinal encryption framework that generates three independent keys—RDDM (Retinal Diagonal Distance Metric), ROTD (Radial Origin-Terminus Distance), and DRID (Diagonal–Radial Intersection Distance) —from a single retinal vessel map. This framework is intended as a biometric-driven key generation and strengthening module to enhance user authentication, rather than a standalone standard encryption algorithm. It operates under a threat model focused on resisting brute-force key guessing in controlled biometric contexts, but not advanced attacks like quantum cryptanalysis or side-channel exploitation. Retinal images undergo preprocessing (CLAHE, vessel segmentation, skeletonization, endpoint detection) to extract stable endpoints. These endpoints produce distance measures that are normalized and combined into polyalphabetic key streams. We provide stepwise derivations of the encryption E (x) and decryption D (y) equations, explicitly justify mod 124 as the symbol table size used in implementation, and include a detailed cryptanalytic evaluation (entropy, NIST SP800-22 randomness tests, Hamming distance, collision analysis, noise sensitivity, and Full-Space Key Guessing (FSKG) calculations). Experimental results on three retinal samples (nᵥessels = 27, 41, 105) show substantially increased FSKG times and near-maximal key entropy relative to single-key baselines. Limitations and sensitivity to image quality are discussed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Banu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69bb9212496e729e6297f5eahttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40962-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Image Encryption Algorithms: A Survey of Design and Evaluation Metrics2024 · 86 citations
  2. 2Securing IoT edge device communication with efficient ECC middleware for resource-constrained systems2024 · 4 citations
  3. 3Retina Based Glowworm Swarm Optimization for Random Cryptographic Key Generation2021 · 11 citations
  4. 4Handbook of Fingerprint Recognition2009 · 2,177 citations
  5. 5Proposal of a new method for image encryption and decryption technique2019 · 2 citations