PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 19, 2026BMC Health Services Research0 citationsOpen Access

Service delivery and challenges in healthy life centers: lessons for strengthening primary health care from Turkey

EYElif Nur Yıldırım-ÖztürkÖAÖnder AydemirMKM. Koc

Key Points

  • To identify strengths and challenges in service delivery at Turkey's Healthy Life Centers to inform improvements in primary health care.
  • Utilized a mixed-methods design combining quantitative and qualitative approaches.
  • Conducted a cross-sectional study with 208 participants for quantitative data.
  • Employed a phenomenological approach with 44 healthcare professionals for qualitative insights.
  • Analyzed quantitative data using chi-square tests and qualitative data via thematic coding.
  • 77.9% of participants found the range of services satisfactory.
  • 92.8% considered the services beneficial.
  • Over half of health professionals rated HLC conditions positively.
  • Significant differences in service perception were noted based on location and physical building status.

Abstract

Primary health care (PHC) is central to universal health coverage, yet delivery performance varies across settings. This study examines Turkey’s Healthy Life Centers (HLCs)—a nationwide PHC-strengthening initiative—by including all 11 HLCs in Konya to identify service delivery strengths, operational challenges, and improvement priorities with lessons relevant to other upper-middle-income contexts. A mixed-methods design was applied. The quantitative element utilized a cross-sectional design involving 208 participants, while the qualitative element followed a phenomenological approach with 44 participants. The participants were physicians in charge of HLCs and staff delivering services to applicants. Data were collected using two separate forms. Quantitative data were analyzed using chi-square tests (p < 0.05). Qualitative transcripts were coded to identify themes. Quantitative results showed that 77.9% of participants found the range of services satisfactory and 92.8% considered them beneficial. More than half of health professionals rated HLC conditions positively. Significant differences were identified by location and building status, largely reflecting physical conditions. Qualitative findings highlighted service gaps, perceptions of service delivery, physical conditions, community awareness, patients/applicants’ needs, referrals from other institutions, appointment system, and safety needs. This is one of the few studies examining HLCs in Turkey from the provider perspective. A mixed-methods design enabled a more comprehensive evaluation. Findings can guide targeted improvements in infrastructure, service delivery models, and referral mechanisms within HLCs and provide actionable insights for policymakers and managers to strengthen primary health care, with relevance to other upper-middle-income settings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yıldırım-Öztürk et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69bb926a496e729e6297fbcfhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-14341-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Under-utilisation of noncommunicable disease screening and healthy lifestyle promotion centres: A cross-sectional study from Sri Lanka2024 · 4 citations
  2. 2Türkiye'deki Birinci Basamak Sağlık Merkezlerinde Sağlıklı Beslenme ve Obezite Hizmetlerinin Değerlendirilmesi2020 · 8 citations
  3. 3Performance of health and wellness centre in providing primary care services in Chhattisgarh, India2024 · 12 citations
  4. 4Using thematic analysis in psychology2006 · 192,431 citations
  5. 5Effectiveness of mDiabetes intervention in enhancing diabetes awareness and promoting healthy lifestyle changes among the general population in rural India2025 · 7 citations