PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 19, 2026Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining0 citations

Bread waste biorefining: a low‐cost substrate for biomass production

View Full Paper
SBSana Ben Hamad BouhamedIAImen Ben AtitallahNBN. Bahloul

Key Points

  • The study aims to assess the microbial valorization of bread waste by evaluating its potential as a feedstock for biomass production.
  • Used a newly isolated yeast strain, Saccharomyces cerevisiae X19G2.
  • Performed saccharification of bread waste via acidic pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis.
  • Optimized biomass production conditions using a Box–Behnken design.
  • Evaluated four independent variables: KH2PO4, MgCl2, yeast extract, and inoculum size.
  • Achieved reducing sugars yields of 118.70, 125.52, and 63.94 g L−1 from different hydrolysis methods.
  • Optimal growth conditions resulted in maximum biomass production after 72 hours of fermentation.
  • Highest biomass yield reached was 0.41 g g−1 with a production rate of 0.54 g L−1 h−1 using commercial enzymatic hydrolysate.

Abstract

Abstract The microbial valorization of bread waste (BW) represents an innovative biotechnological strategy for converting food waste into a renewable feedstock for the bio‐based industry, thereby supporting the principles of a circular economy. The present study focuses on exploring the potential use of BW as feedstock for biomass using a newly isolated yeast strain, Saccharomyces cerevisiae X19G2. The saccharification of BW was performed via acidic (H 2 SO 4 ) pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis using either commercial amylolytic enzymes ( α ‐amylase and amyloglucosidase) or lab‐scale α ‐amylase secretome of Bacillus halotolerans Gb67, yielding 118.70, 125.52 and 63.94 g L −1 of reducing sugars, respectively. The optimization of biomass production conditions was performed using a Box–Behnken design, evaluating four independent variables: KH 2 PO 4 concentration (1–7 g L −1 ), MgCl 2 concentration (0.1–1.9 g L −1 ), yeast extract concentration (0.1–4.9 g L −1 ), and inoculum size (1–9%). The optimal growth conditions were 4.75 g L −1 KH 2 PO 4 , 1.19 g L −1 MgCl 2 , 3.68 g L −1 yeast extract, and 6.73% inoculum size. Under these conditions, maximum biomass production values of 24.80, 25.88, and 15.60 g L −1 were achieved after 72 h of fermentation using acidic hydrolysate, commercial enzymatic hydrolysate (CEH), and B. haloterans Gb67 enzymatic hydrolysate (Gb67H), respectively. The highest biomass yield (0.41 g g −1 ) and volumetric production rate (0.54 g L −1 h −1 ) were obtained after 48 h of fermentation using CEH. Therefore, this study highlights the promising potential of BW hydrolysate as a sustainable feedstock for biomass production by S. cerevisiae X19G2, with potential applications in the feed industry.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bouhamed et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69bb929b496e729e6298002fhttps://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.70140
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper