PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 19, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Three-Dimensional Digital Anthropometry for Clinical Care and Public Health: A Systematic Review of Measurement Validity, Utility, and Implementation

View Full Paper
RUR UdeWVW B VidonaIDI E Dare

Key Points

  • This review aims to evaluate the validity and implementation of three-dimensional digital body measurement in clinical and public health contexts.
  • Included seven studies from 2020 to 2025 focusing on various populations, including healthy individuals and patients.
  • Assessed technologies such as optical, laser, photonic, and smartphone 3D scanners.
  • Analyzed measurement accuracy against reference standards for body volume, circumference, and composition.
  • 3D measurements showed high agreement with reference standards indicating strong validity.
  • Repeated scans demonstrated strong reliability and minimal technical errors.
  • Body-shape modeling identified cardiovascular risk phenotypes beyond traditional metrics like BMI.

Abstract

ABSTRACT This systematic review examines the accuracy, consistency, and translational potential of three-dimensional (3D) digital body measurement in clinical and public health settings. Seven studies published between 2020 and 2025 were included covering healthy children and adults, patients in weight management clinics, and large population surveys. Technologies assessed included optical, laser, photonic, and smartphone 3D scanners. Across the studies, 3D measurements demonstrated high agreement with reference standards for body volume, circumference, and composition, with repeated scans showing strong reliability and minimal technical error. Body-shape modeling enabled identification of phenotypes associated with cardiovascular risk that are not captured by conventional metrics such as BMI. Early implementation in clinical and pediatric settings was feasible, and population-level applications indicated scalability. However, evidence on usability, cost, device calibration, and long-term maintenance remains limited. Overall, 3D digital anthropometry demonstrates strong potential as a precise, reproducible, and non-invasive approach for body measurement. However, current evidence remains limited, and further research is needed to evaluate cost-effectiveness, standardization, and long-term applicability in clinical and public health settings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ude et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69bb92ae496e729e6298023ahttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19077796
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper