PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 19, 2026Mathematics1 citationsOpen Access

Generalized Open Sets and Closure Operators via Point-to-Neighborhood Assignments

View Full Paper
AAAhu Açıkgöz

Key Points

  • This research aims to define and analyze a new type of topological space using point-to-neighborhood assignments.
  • Defined an aura topological space using a function that assigns open sets to points.
  • Introduced various types of new open sets and closure operators.
  • Compared these new structures with existing topological frameworks.
  • Constructed counterexamples to differentiate classes of open sets.
  • Identified the properties of the aura closure operator, showing it meets certain conditions like extensivity and monotonicity.
  • Established a hierarchy of new open set classes related to classical counterparts.
  • Demonstrated the equivalence of specific separation axioms within the aura framework.
  • Provided counterexamples within finite spaces and the real line to illustrate differences between classes.

Abstract

We equip a topological space (X, τ) with a function a: X→τ satisfying the single axiom x∈a (x). The resulting triple (X, τ, a), which we call an aura topological space, provides a point-to-open-set assignment that differs from all existing auxiliary structures in topology—ideals, filters, grills, primals, and the various non-classical frameworks based on fuzzy, soft, or neutrosophic sets. The aura-closure operator cla (A) =x∈X: a (x) ∩A≠⌀ is shown to be an additive Čech closure operator; it satisfies extensivity, monotonicity, and finite additivity, but idempotency fails in general. Iterating cla transfinitely yields a Kuratowski closure whose topology τa∞ satisfies τa∞=τa⊆τ, where τa is the collection of all a-open sets. We introduce a-semi-open, a-pre-open, a-α-open, and a-β-open sets, determine the complete hierarchy among these classes and their classical counterparts, and separate all non-coinciding classes by counterexamples on finite spaces as well as on the real line. The notions of a-convergence of sequences and the corresponding continuity notions and their decompositions are studied. Separation axioms a-Ti (i = 0, 1, 2) are introduced, and it is proved that a-T1 and a-T2 are equivalent. A detailed comparison with ideals, filters, grills, and primals highlights the distinctive features of the aura framework.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ahu Açıkgöz (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69bb92ae496e729e629802c1https://doi.org/10.3390/math14061013
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper