PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 19, 2026PLoS ONE0 citationsOpen Access

Bayesian hierarchical modelling of academic orientation and advising effects on student retention and progression: Multi-cohort evidence

View Full Paper
MMMoeketsi MosiaLSLerato Maletlala SekonyelaFEFelix Egara

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore how academic orientation and advising affect student retention and progression.
  • Utilized administrative data from 8,300 undergraduate students across three entry cohorts.
  • Employed Bayesian hierarchical multivariate modelling to analyze outcomes.
  • Operationalized retention as enrollment in the following academic year.
  • Stronger academic orientation performance positively relates to retention and progression.
  • Engagement with academic advising improves outcomes, especially with better orientation performance.
  • Combination of orientation and advising exhibits complementary effects rather than differential effectiveness.

Abstract

Student retention and academic progression remain central concerns in higher education, particularly within contexts characterised by widening access and structural inequality. This study examines the independent and interactive effects of academic orientation performance and academic advising utilisation on first-year student retention and progression at a South African public university. Using administrative data from 8,300 undergraduate students across three entry cohorts spanning the 2023–2024 academic periods, we employ Bayesian hierarchical multivariate modelling to account for cohort-level variation and the interdependence between retention and progression outcomes. Retention is operationalised as enrolment in the subsequent academic year and is analysed only for cohorts with observable follow-up data (based on confirmed registration records), while academic progression is examined for all cohorts. Results indicate that stronger performance in academic orientation is positively associated with both retention and progression, while engagement with academic advising is associated with improved outcomes, particularly when combined with higher orientation performance. The observed interaction effects suggest complementary engagement between orientation and advising rather than differential treatment effectiveness, and all estimated relationships are interpreted as associative rather than causal. Model comparison results indicate statistically indistinguishable predictive performance between joint and univariate specifications, with the joint model offering additional inferential advantages by capturing correlations between outcomes. Overall, the findings highlight the value of integrated first-year support interventions and demonstrate the utility of Bayesian hierarchical approaches for analysing complex, multi-cohort educational data in Global South higher education contexts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mosia et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69bb92d1496e729e62980786https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345001
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Undergraduate Student Retention Activities: Challenges and Research Agenda2024 · 21 citations
  2. 2Enhancing interest and performance with a utility value intervention.2010 · 765 citations
  3. 3Bayesian Growth Curve Modelling of Student Academic Trajectories: The Impact of Individual-Level Characteristics and Implications for Education Policy2025 · 11 citations
  4. 4Assessing an Online Student Orientation: Impacts on Retention, Satisfaction, and Student Learning2019 · 45 citations
  5. 5Barriers to undergraduate medical students’ research engagement in Pakistan: a qualitative exploration2025 · 33 citations