PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 19, 2026Systems0 citationsOpen Access

Pressure Wave Propagation Optimization Models for Supply Chain Risk Mitigation

View Full Paper
MLMing LiuRZRui ZhangYDYi Ding

Key Points

  • The central aim is to develop an optimization model for assessing and mitigating bi-directional disruption risks in supply chains.
  • Proposed a pressure wave-based approach inspired by fluid mechanics.
  • Conceptualized disruptions as pressure signals in cluster supply chain networks.
  • Developed a mathematical optimization framework for risk mitigation strategies.
  • Conducted numerical experiments to validate the proposed method.
  • Achieved up to a 40% reduction in the Cluster Propagation Vulnerability Index (CPVI).
  • Demonstrated effectiveness in mitigating disruption risks in supply chains.
  • Provided insights into risk influencing factors and dynamic restructuring of supply chains.

Abstract

Supply chain (SC) disruption risk assessment and mitigation have attracted significant attention in both academia and practice. However, existing research predominantly focuses on unidirectional disruption propagation, either forward or backward, despite the reality that risks can propagate bi-directionally in complex supply chain networks. Furthermore, conventional assessment tools often concentrate on conceptualizing and quantifying risks, while risk mitigation requires mathematical optimization approaches. To bridge these gaps, this paper proposes a novel pressure wave-based approach inspired by fluid mechanics to assess bi-directional disruption propagation in cluster supply chain networks (CSCNs). The method conceptualizes disruptions as pressure signals that transmit between SC partners and explicitly quantifies disruption severity through wave intensity. By employing mathematical optimization, we develop a framework that assists managers in optimizing risk mitigation strategies, including inventory buffering and cross-chain cooperation. Numerical experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method in explaining risk influencing factors, mitigating disruption risks, and achieving dynamic restructuring of SC structures. The results show that our approach reduces the Cluster Propagation Vulnerability Index (CPVI) by up to 40% compared to baseline models without optimization decisions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69bb9336496e729e629812bbhttps://doi.org/10.3390/systems14030316
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper